The Insighter

The Real Number of Illegal Aliens

2007-06-14T06:40:00.000-04:00

The number of undocumented aliens in the country is not as many as all those "hide-the-women-and-children", "don't shoot till you see the whites of their eyes" fear mongers claim it is.

It's not 20 million. Not 12 to 13 million.

Here's the truth and the real number:

298,000,000 illegal aliens!

Yup, that's the real number.
And why so high, you ask?

It's the number left over after you subtract the native American, Hawaiian and Eskimo populations from the census figures.

The truth is simple: what laws did the European-descended Americans break?

I cut a break for African-Americans because their ancestors were brought here as slaves and thus against their will.

If it weren't so serious, I'd have to laugh.

Here we have the anti-immigrant forces crying about people breaking the laws when their European ancestors had little or no regard for any treaty they signed with the Indians (i.e., native Americans).

When did the native Americans give permission for Europeans to steal their land?
Or kill the buffalo herds in massive numbers and destroy their environment?

Or how about the massacre of hundreds of thousands of native Americans?

It's funny how the conservatives cry about obedience to the law when their forefathers had no regard for the people they practically pushed off the continent. And only when they won the continent - they have a museum in St Louis called the "Museum of Western Expansion" - did they ever care to make - and had - reservations about making these reservations for the people they displaced.

Yes, what a lie - Western Expansion! Let's call it what it really was: empire building. This is a classic Orwellian double-speak.

Now that others - Spanish-speaking people and others - are doing the same to them, suddenly, they demand that these others follow laws that European ancestors never had any intentions of complying with. What a bunch of hypocrites!

Point is simple: immigration reform and related laws have no moral justification for their existence. And when you lose the moral high ground, you lose.

That's why you get what you're getting.

God never had any immigration policy. I didn't see anywhere in the Bible where it says that North America is reserved for white, European people. And with an estimated 12 to 20 million so-called illegals", America and North America is getting what it deserves.

God must have a sense of humor. HE certainly has a sense of justice.

That's what we're seeing here - slowly but surely.

So let's dissect this latest - stupid piece of legislation about immigration.

The conservatives - once who had some semblance of belief in a free America - are so anal about this bill - calling it "amnesty".

What a crock.

Provisions: pay fines and $5000 - who among these poor people have THAT kind of money to be able to pay and stay?

Another: go back to your country and wait - maybe 5 to 8 years? Who's going to be patient enough? The bill's crafters knew this and put it, hoping that much of the problem would go away. In this emotional environment, even this wasn't good enough to merely "nudge-and-wink" away.

Let's call these two provisions what they really are: deportation by stealth!

They say that immigration law is a mess. Yes, it should be abolished altogether. It's immoral and unjust and the reason they are being broken is that it has no moral justification whatsoever.

Some people will call my stance unreasonable and let's be realistic. OK - by that they mean that these laws are enforced by brute force. We're right because we can beat you up.

Yup, that's very moral high ground, I tell ya.

It's as moral high ground as massacring the native population and stealing their land.

The historical apologists will point to treaties and say the "injuns" signed them. Only one problem: it's the very legal term employed in English common law that European descent Americans employ: duress - agreement under force.

Let's see what else passes for discourse in this immigration reform:

Consrvatives want Gestapo-like checkpoints, national ID cards AND a wall to keep people out. Yes - all in the name of freedom! Where do I sign up?

And those minutemen patrolling the border: citizens misguided by warped notions. Beware, boys, that you take matters into your own hands. God doesn't like people who have only a pretense of justice.

The same people who like to crow about a free America - the conservatives - are the biggest fascists of them all - and they don't realize just stupidly downhill they've gone.

Suddenly, the same ones who were against Big Government are all for it when it suits their purpose. And when I've pointed this out - and other points I've made here - they can't answer me. They can't and won't - because they know they're in the wrong.

And that wall - some 700 miles long. Now how long is the border?

With Mexico - some 2,500 miles long.
With Canada - some 4,000 miles, and not including the one with Alaska.

Yea, that'll work fine!

The illegal immigrants of European ancestors are making laws against others to keep them out while they broke every law they preach to others to follow.

Yessirree! the truth comes out now:

298 million illegal aliens!

Hamas Electoral Win Is A Reality Check

2006-01-31T20:32:00.000-05:00

Well, I wonder what the world is going to do now.

Now that Hamas has clearly won the Philistine elections, what will the world do about it?

Now that it is clear that the Arabs are the bully, how is the Gentile world going to try to justify cheering for the bully to justify its hidden antiSemitism, and try to pretend that they are bastion of morality?

Yes, tough job it is, and they can no longer hide the truth. They expected the Jews to commit suicide. Now the Gentiles will have to build the gas chambers all over again if they want to kill Jews!

I call them the Philistine elections because THAT is what they were – because the word “Palestine” is Latin for “Philistine” – a race of giants that the Israelites defeated many centuries ago to establish their kingdom.

We already have many leaders on record as saying that they won’t deal with Hamas, and even the EU has branded Hamas as a terrorist group. Now that terrorists are elected, we know the true intentions of Islam.

What straws will the delusionists for peace will grab at? Be sure that the Hamas group will throw them a few. Somehow, the idiots for peace in the Middle Peace will try to find some plausible way to deny that there’s an 800-pound gorilla in the living room.

Hamas winning an election is just too obvious to ignore and defies any type of spin. It has totally shattered the delusional view that peace can be possible. The margin of Hamas’ victory is so great that there is no other conclusion that the peace process has been exposed as a fraud, and rightly so.

Anybody who now tries to spin this development in a positive way will be looked upon as a fool. Hamas received a greater margin of victory than Hitler ever did. They have an outright majority and will not need to be in partnership with anybody.

Greater implications still: acting PM Olmert of Israel is going to find it impossible to justify any further unilateral disengagements.

Another implication: Kadima, the new party formed by the dying Ariel Sharon, is basically finished. Its entire reason for existence is based upon a delusion of peace being a possibility and thus further disengagements are necessary.

In fact, what made this Hamas victory possible was the unilateral disengagement from Gaza and Northern Shomron. They clearly believe that they are in the right. They believe that they hold the moral high ground. When one concedes the moral high ground, you might as well concede defeat because you are then the enemy.

And Hamas has already declared that they will form an army and they will not talk unless it is in their interests. It is also clear from their talk that they are not interested in peace.

So what happens to the all the billions of aid promised to the Philistine Authority?

The Bush Administration says that they will negate it unless there are advances for peace.

They are wishing in vain. So far, the entire world has seen that there indeed IS an 800 pound gorilla in the living room, but they are trying hard to imagine a 50 pound monkey with a tail.

More reality will set in.

It is my fondest hope that the foolish Gentiles begin to realize that the truth that there is no way out of this reality.

But wishful thinking dies hard, and they will try to find a way to blame Israel if they falter from a stupid Bush Road Map To Peace.

The truth is that the Bush Road Map is dead. It is as dead as the Oslo Accords before it.

And the truth is that the Disengagement enabled the victory of Hamas in the first place in the Philistine Elections and thus forced the world to confront their own anti-Semitic prejudice before their very eyes.

And a further truth is that the previous Oslo Accords signed by the foolish Israeli Prime Minister Barak back when Clinton was the U.S. President – signed before the events of September 11, 2001 – enabled those same events to take place. You see, that was a historic “peace” agreement that conceded the existence of a Philistine State within the State of Israel on “so-called Occupied Lands” – the same territory that was won by Israel in a defensive war in 1967 whom the enemies of Israel were determined to wipe Israel off the map.

No suicide bombers ever existed in Israel before the Oslo Accords were signed. In fact, the border between the pre-1967 borders and the so-called occupied lands were guarded by a reserve IDF with a simple piece of rope!

What happened since then to change it all to have Merkava tanks and Apache helicopters to guard the same areas before? Simple: the moral high ground changed. Israel used to demand that the Holy Land was theirs and theirs alone. With the signing of the Oslo Accords, they conceded territory and thus moral high ground. It gave credence to Arab claims that the entire Holy Land was the Philistine land to which they lay claim. And since they lay claim to 100% - and not 20% of this land – this means that effectively, the Hamas election victory means a legitimate claim to ALL the land and not just a 20% stake. They will not be satisfied with just 20%.

They want it all!

Still, the Western nations of Gentiles wish to see the monkey instead of the gorilla that they know for sure is in the living room.

There can be NO denial of the truth.

Yet the only reason that the denial persists is because it is hard for the wishful thinkers for peace to realize that IT IS OVER, and that ISRAEL WAS RIGHT ALL ALONG and will always be right.

And secretly, I think that the wishful thinkers know that since they have been proven wrong, it also deprives them of the moral high ground – and this means that all of which Western civilization stands for is also wrong.

Let’s face it: when somebody is morally invested and emotionally invested in delusional wishful thinking and that same somebody sees it explode in their faces so blatantly, it’s hard to accept that you are wrong because it challenges ALL your basic thought processes and your world view!

The Western paradigm as it pertains to Israel is WRONG!

And it isn’t just 20% wrong. Nope, it’s not even 50% wrong. It is all wrong!

And what’s worse, the entire peace process has been in effect wrong since 1967 when Israel defeated the enemies who sought its entire destruction. That’s a full 38 years and then some months to this point in time.

It’s hard for the delusional, wishful thinkers to accept defeat and that their peace paradigm is false.

But it shouldn’t be a surprise to any person who has power to think!

LET ME TELL YOU WHY:

Most of you who will read this blog probably weren’t even born in 1967, or else were too young to remember the truth. But I’ll tell you right now, since I was 15 at the time of the 1967 Arab-Israeli War, or the 6-Day War as they call it, I will set you straight as to the truth.

Fact #1 is this: the Arab states of Egypt, Jordan and Syria all started the provocation in the first place by a blockade of the Gulf of Aqaba – the arm of the Red Sea that is on the right side of the Sinai Peninsula. This is where the Israeli port of Eilat is situated, and where they got many of their goods by shipping.

Fact #2 is this: the armies of Egypt, Jordan and Syria all amassed their armies in an attempt to eliminate Israel from the map. Never was there ever any talk of “peace” before 1967, or any deals of “land for peace”.

Fact #3 is this : Yasser Arafat established and founded the PLO (Palestine Liberation Organization) in the year 1964. But isn’t it funny that Israel never controlled the Gaza Strip, Golan Heights or the West Bank – all territories won during the 6-Day War – until 1967? Say what?

So the question becomes this: from whom was Arafat trying to liberate this so-called Palestine from? It couldn’t be Israel, because they didn’t run those territories until after they defeated 3 hostile Arab nations who were trying to eliminate it off the map.

So then what was the purpose of establishing the PLO? Were there any liberation groups within the Gaza Strip or the West Bank to free them from domination by Egypt (who owned the Gaza Strip?) or from Jordan (who controlled the West Bank pre-1967)? It’s funny, but I don’t seem to recall from my memory any such resistance! The only purpose for the establishment of the PLO could only be the erasure of Israel from the world map. Only a fool could try to argue otherwise.

Fact #4 is this: when the Romans invaded Israel when they were an empire, they renamed the Holy Land “Palestine” to rub it into the faces of the defeated, legitimate inhabitants, the Jews. The word “Palestine” means “Philistine” in Latin. It is the equivalent of the word “nigger” today.

Fact #5 is this: when the Arab nations of Egypt, Syria and Jordan lost badly in the 1967 6-Day War, peace was never even mentioned when they lost. In fact, the entire Arabd world was in unison for Israel to remove themselves off the “occupied lands”. Never was there ever a call of peace with Israel.

Fact #6 is this: The U.S.S.R. (now a lesser Russia) threatened to start a nuclear war because they sponsored the Arab states while the U.S.A. sponsored Israel, but then suddenly, there was this miraculous “Land for Peace” initiative that was sponsored to appease the USSR from going nuclear.

Fact #7 is this: Since when in history has a nation that had to defend itself from 3 hostile neighboring nations who were also numerically superior, also had to be forced to give up lands that it legitimately conquered, had legitimate ancient, historical and religious claims thereto – and all in the name of a “promise” of peace? The answer is none.

In fact, reduce the qualifications of the above even further, and you’ll find that no nation has ever been demanded to give back territory that they won in war even if they were totally wrong. Why are Gentiles so insistent that Israel be denied what other nations who win wars are not even questioned about? Are Jews the plantation slaves, the “N-word”?

The Days of Reckoning have begun. Remember the last verses of Malachi:

“Lo, I will send the prophet Elijah to you before the coming of the awesome, fearful day of the Lord.

“He will reconcile parents with children and children with parents, so that, when I come, I do not strike the whole land with utter destruction.”

Ariel Sharon - A Stroke of Good Luck

2006-01-06T02:50:00.000-05:00

Today, I am observing all the news regarding the apparently poor health of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.

It appears that the second stroke that he’s suffered means that his life in politics is over.

Now normally while it’s considered in bad taste to attack a man while he’s down, I waive that social nicety because it should be reserved for people who truly deserve it.

And Ariel Sharon doesn’t deserve it. He was a good man who turned evil and he is getting what he truly deserves right now.

The rabbis, other religious leaders and some politicians of stature are praying and urging prayers.

But prayers shouldn’t be for a recovery. It should be to thank G-d for striking down such an evil man who became a traitor to his own people.

Yes, prayers should be offered to G-d to thank Him for squelching this scum of a man who wanted to betray Israel in the name of fictitious and fraudulent peace process.

I deliver my own eulogy to this evil man.

Sharon was called a man who wanted peace through strength.

What garbage!

Nothing so clearly illustrates the delusional mindset that permeates its stench across the world and acts to paint Israel as the bad guy, when in fact, the Jews are the real natives of the Holy Land and deserve to be there – without any Arabs whatsoever.

The only true peace through strength is by force of arms by the winning side.

Ariel Sharon’s Disengagement Plan from the Gaza Strip was intended as a goodwill gesture to the Arabs to come to the peace table.

That’s funny. I don’t recall that Article 15 of the PLO Charter was ever rescinded. That clause calls for the destruction of Israel. I don’t hear any of the Gentile nations demanding its removal. You’ll not hear any such talk either. Here is the exact clause, Article 15, of the PLO Charter:

“The Liberation of Palestine, from an Arab viewpoint, is a national (qawmi) duty and it attempts to repel the Zionist and imperialist aggression against the Arab homeland, and aims at the liquidation of the Zionist presence in Palestine.

Absolute responsibility for this falls upon the Arab Nation – peoples and governments – with the Arab people in Palestine in the vanguard. Accordingly, the Arab nation must mobilize all its military, human, moral and spiritual capabilities to participate actively with the Palestinian people in the liberation of Palestine.

It must, particularly in the phase of the armed Palestinian revolution, offer and furnish the Palestinian people with all possible help, and material and human support, and make available to them the means and opportunities that will enable them to continue to carry out their leading role in the armed revolution, until they liberate their homeland.”

I also don’t recall any of the numerous articles relating to the Hamas Charter relating to the destruction of Israel being rescinded either. It’s not likely because the entire charter would then be meaningless. Hamas wouldn’t have a reason to exist.

It is against this backdrop that we have a peace process, which is in effect, a mockery of diplomacy and of justice.

Like the old Ginsu Knives infomercial, “But wait! There’s more!”

Since Disengagement, the PA and Hamas have never even made any moves toward peace. They are using it as an excuse to smuggle even more arms and weapons into Gaza and hit Jewish cities and targets even further inland. This has validated the fears of those who said that disengagement would result in exactly that.

But wait, there’s more!

Apparently, this hasn’t dampened the enthusiasm of wishful thinkers for the failed Oslo Accords to be further implemented and for the Bush Road Map to go forward. Both are effectively dead. If they are implemented and brought back to life, it will be Jews who will be dead instead.

And what concessions have the Arabs offered toward this goodwill gesture?

Nothing.

They just sat back and watched while their enemy imploded and got land for free without wasting any bullets.

What’s more, the Arabs are receiving and being promised financial aid from America and Europe – when they haven’t even been able to demonstrate that they’re using what they are already getting, wisely.

But wait, there’s even more!

The greenhouses in the Gaza Strip left forcibly behind by expelled Jewish families of farmers who worked so hard to make this desert bloom with bug-free crops, were taken over by Arabs (at least the ones not looted or destroyed by Arab thugs) and they couldn’t replicate the success of bug-free crops, except for strawberries.

These Gaza farmland crops accounted for 11% of Israeli agricultural exports. What does Israel do to make up for this?

But wait, there’s even more!

This is the first time in history that I know of that citizens of a democratic nation have been forcibly expelled from their legitimate homes. This is the legacy of Ariel Sharon.

Is that the act of a good man who advocates “peace through strength”? Do you forcibly remove citizens of a democratic nation in the name of peace? Who was it that allowed them to settle there in Gaza in the first place? Why, Ariel Sharon had a hand in it.

But wait, there’s more!

Why surely, the settlers have been compensated fairly, right? That’s what the naïve world seems to think – at least those who haven’t bothered to find out the facts.

The settlers have been treated badly even after their forcible removal from Gaza and Northern Shomron. They are basically refugees in the very land they live in – no permanent homes, no towns, and no stability of any kind.

And the promised payments have either been slow in coming, smaller than promised or not even received.

And we are talking about people who were proudly self-employed and self-reliant, who know have to depend on government programs like welfare and unemployment insurance where once they worked before and were not a social burden.

This is also the doing, the legacy of Ariel Sharon, and it is clear that he wanted the disengagement to succeed without ever giving any thought or afterthought to the plight of the displaced settlers.

But wait, there’s even more!

According to Channel 10 in Israel, and reported by Arutz-7 in Israel, Ariel Sharon is the recipient of a $3,000,000 bribe from an Austrian millionaire. This is an investigation that has been ongoing for 3 years.

This is in addition to the Greek Island Affair, where Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and his son, Omri, are linked to a corrupt fundraising scandal.

In fact, the latter scandal is one suspected reason why Ariel Sharon turned his back on the election promises he was elected upon not to surrender any more Jewish land. He was rumored to be about to lose office because of this scandal.

Because of this, he invented the Disengagement Plan and immediately became the darling of the left-tilting and left-dominated mainstream news media, who hate the settlers even more than they previously hated Ariel Sharon.

The coverage of the Greek Island affair mysteriously dropped from the headlines and Ariel Sharon became a celebrity, a hero of the Left.

But wait, there’s even more!

It appears that the Sharon family will have a large financial stake in gambling casinos being planned for the Arabs in the Gaza Strip and other “disengaged” Jewish lands, and they will rake in millions while betraying their own Jewish kinsmen!

Yes, you’ve got to love these men of peace. So free of moral blemish are they! SO righteous and free of corruption are they!

But wait, there’s more!

Ariel Sharon had managed to turn the Likud Party into his own personal fiefdom and threatened to turn the Prime Minister’s Office into a dictatorship. It was the shrewd actions of the largest faction in the Likud – Manhigut Yehudit – that managed to stymie his efforts and draw attention to his shenanigans.

Because of this, I suspect, he deserted to Likud to form his own political party, Kadima.

He once said while he was still in Likud: “It’s either me or Feiglin”.

(Rabbi Moshe Feiglin is the Mahigut Yehudit leader and as a Likud candidate for leader, finished second to Binyamin Netanyahu.)

But now the future of the new party Sharon founded, Kadima, is in serious doubt, because it is widely perceived that Kadima is basically a one-man show. That one man is Ariel Sharon, who now lies in medically-induced coma after his second stroke, and who now is basically out of politics whether he likes it or not.

This is a time for prayer, folks – a prayer of thanks and gratitude!

Ariel Sharon embraced the modern-day equivalent of the Ba’al worshipers of ancient Israel in the form of the leftists who hate Israel as much as a capitalist America and who cling stubbornly to the peace process as one of its false gods.

Consider Ariel Sharon as a modern-day King Ahab. How appropriate that one of his sons is named Omri, the name of one of King Ahab’s sons! It certainly is evident that Ariel and Omri Sharon are going the same way as their ancient counterparts.

And that is how you should view this man Ariel Sharon: as an evil king who is getting exactly what he deserves, and so too will his son Omri.

And if there are any of you who dislike the idea of attacking a man when he’s down, just remember that such social niceties are reserved for people who deserve them, and not for Ariel Sharon or his ilk.

If you are going to take issue with me over this, then it shows how warped, distorted and perversely upside-down your moral structure is.

And it shows how badly the world truly needs a real Israel true to the Torah and true to its destiny to be a light unto all nations.

Clinton and Kyoto

2005-12-20T17:54:00.000-05:00

Oh, I couldn’t resist commenting on this former hillbilly President Clinton and his new attempt to create a historic legacy. As usual, my political commentary will be in the color you see now while the article content will be in black ink.

I promise that everything I say will be what they call in media circles a “money quote”!

Here goes:

Clinton Says Bush Is 'Flat Wrong' on Kyoto

Former President Clinton told a global audience of diplomats, environmentalists and others Friday that the Bush administration is "flat wrong" in claiming that reducing greenhouse-gas emissions to fight global warming would damage the U.S. economy.

With a "serious disciplined effort" to develop energy-saving technology, he said, "we could meet and surpass the Kyoto targets in a way that would strengthen and not weaken our economies."

Clinton, a champion of the Kyoto Protocol, the existing emissions-controls agreement opposed by the Bush administration, spoke in the final hours of a two-week U.N. climate conference at which Washington has come under heavy criticism for its stand.

Hillbilly former President Clinton wants desperately NOT to be known as the elected bozo who will be known in history for getting blowjobs from the slut Monica Lewinsky (White House intern) while he knew that he could have done something about 9/11 beforehand from information already available to him.

Clinton knows that History will judge him more harshly than the groupie press corps who are trying desperately to make a great historic legacy for this “first Black president”, and try to deceive a public who knows the real truth and he sure must know about all the jokes about him going around.

Hey, you got a blazing economy growing at a red-hot 6% - unheard of in a developed, mature economy such as the U.S., times are looking good too – so why do you need to deal with a problem just to muck it all up?

But anyways, if Clinton was such a champion of the Kyoto Protocols, why couldn’t he twist enough arms around in the Senate to ratify it? After all, didn’t his former WH Security chief – Craig Livingstone – have FBI files on 900 Republicans in his possession with information they might try to blackmail GOP votes with?

The Senate vote, I recall, was 98-0 against the Kyoto Accords. Apparently, Democrats weren’t afraid of Clinton either.

"There's no longer any serious doubt that climate change is real, accelerating and caused by human activities," said Clinton, whose address was interrupted repeatedly by enthusiastic applause. "We are uncertain about how deep and the time of arrival of the consequences, but we are quite clear they will not be good."

No serious doubt that climate change is caused by human activity?

Oh, this one I can’t leave alone. I feel like a kid in a candy store!

So suddenly the hillbilly president is now an expert on the subject? I love the challenge.

I once dared somebody to tell me – in virtually an all-liberal email group – to show me the authentically validated, scientific proof, the undisputed study of not only global warming phenomenon, but of acid rain, ozone layer destruction and any other so-called environmental catastrophes floating around today.

I made an open, standing challenge to anyone there to show me the indisputable evidence, the irrefutable study and so on – of any environmental catastrophe being claimed – and to show me the name of the institution, the leader of the research team, where it was conducted and in what year this so-called irrefutable study was done.

There were no takers!

Nobody dared to answer, because there are none!

In fact, I will take this opportunity to again make the challenge and I confidently repeat:

Show me the year of the irrefutable study, who conducted it, what year it was conducted, what environmental catastrophe is being confirmed and which research institution did the research to confirm it.

I will predict right now that there will be no takers because environmentalism is a fraud!

And I was on that mostly-liberal email group for 3 ½ years from about April 2001 until about October 2004 until they couldn’t handle the truth I kept dispensing for them to gag upon until I was asked to leave – without any takers on my dare!

Canadian officials said the U.S. delegation was displeased with the last-minute scheduling of the Clinton speech.

Efforts by host-country Canada and others to draw the United States into the process were failing.

Ah yes, Canada. Let’s rename that country to “Cannot do”!

Here’s a “host country” to this summit of talking heads who apparently has nothing better to do than preach to America about a phony environmental catastrophe.

How about this, you Canadian cowards? Why not try defending your own borders instead of having to depend upon peace with the U.S.? Ingrate!

Yea, I mean all several thousands of miles of coastlines – Arctic, Pacific and Atlantic Oceans – and the 4,000 miles of land border between you and America. How much would it cost you if you had to defend your borders yourself without American help? Would you still be able to afford all those welfare programs you cherish so deeply as your right?

You bunch of deadbeat Canadians!

Who do you think you are to preach to US, eh?

Why don’t you pay your share of the freight? If ever we demanded it, you wouldn’t be talking so high and mighty.

And you wouldn’t have all those welfare programs you can now say you afford because you aren’t paying your fair share of defense. Cowards!

And I know what I’m talking about. You see, Canadians distrust other people but they trust their governments. In the U.S., it’s the other way around. People trust other people but not their governments. It’s why Canadians are some of the most heavily-taxed people in the Western, developed countries.

Clinton's vice president, Al Gore, was instrumental in final negotiations on the 1997 treaty protocol that was initialed in the Japanese city of Kyoto and mandates cutbacks in 35 industrialized nations of emissions of carbon dioxide and five other gases by 2012.

A broad scientific consensus agrees that these gases accumulating in the atmosphere, byproducts of automobile engines, power plants and other fossil fuel-burning industries, contributed significantly to the past century's global temperature rise of 1 degree Fahrenheit. Continued warming is expected to disrupt the global climate.

In the late 1990s the U.S. Senate balked at ratifying Kyoto, and the incoming President Bush in 2001 formally renounced the accord, saying it would harm the U.S. economy.

Broad, scientific consensus exists? Where? This “news” article never quotes this “study of scientific consensus” they so freely claims that exists. Apparently, this article is nothing more than a disguised editorial masquerading itself as “news”.

But the good news is that they at least reported that the U.S. Senate “balked” at ratifying the Kyoto Protocol. But they don’t mention that the vote was unanimous, a 98-0 vote!

Here we have a liberal bastion of the mainstream news media trying to manipulate the news and trying to influence you, the supposed newsreader, into changing your mind.

Fortunately, you have me on your side to expose the fraud.

The Montreal meeting, attended by almost 10,000 delegates, environmentalists, business representatives and others, was the first annual U.N. climate conference since Kyoto took effect in February.

The protocol's language requires its member nations to begin talks now on emissions controls after 2012, when the Kyoto regime expires. The Canadians and others also saw Montreal as an opportunity to draw the outsider United States into the emission-controls regime, through discussions under the broader 1992 U.N. climate treaty.

But the Americans have repeatedly rejected the idea of rejoining future negotiations to set post-2012 emissions controls. The Canadians continued to press for agreement early Friday, offering the U.S. delegation vague, noncommittal language by which Washington would join only in "exploring" "approaches" to cooperative action.

While rejecting mandatory targets, the Bush administration points to $3 billion-a-year U.S. government spending on research and development of energy-saving technologies as a demonstration of U.S. efforts to combat climate change.

Translation time!

This means that the propaganda machine is trying too hard to convince you of the environmentalist fraud and fairy tales – as if there were a consensus, and that reasonable people must surely come to an agreement and oh how things will be so “groovy” if the Americans just went along with the rest of those superiorly-informed world citizens of dangers to our globe!

Maybe we can all have a group hug and sing Koom-Bah-Yah!

Don’t Bogart that joint, my friend!

Oh, by the way – to anybody reading this who is under the age of 50 – that last sentence refers to a 1960s’ saying about hogging a marijuana joint to yourself for a long puff to get stoned on the weed of the times.

One last piece of advice to the Generation Xers and younger who might be reading this:

Don’t believe your elder relative who is about 40 to 50 or older and says he or she never tried drugs, or didn’t inhale.

They are embarrassed that drug-taking in any form are now laughed at by the likes of you. So they’ll try to claim it was somebody else – not them – that did so.

As somebody who is 53 at the time of this writing, it is an outright lie. They never thought it wouldn’t be groovy to take drugs!

So if you are a younger person, and your uncle, aunt or “other” relative says in answer to your question of whether they experimented with drugs – just tell them this:

GROOVY!

Watch their reaction. And then start laughing, smiling or smirking – because you know that you just caught them in a lie!

And you can say that I told you so – give them this web site to say so.

In fact, I’ll back you up. You do this, and I’ll give you more ammo to use against your relative who thinks he or she knows it all!

Just respond to this post, and I’ll gladly expose that person for who he or she is.

And don’t be betrayed by a false sense of familial loyalty.

What would you rather have? A family member who wants to keep himself trapped in delusional lies or one who is brave and courageous enough to face the truth and make a change for the better?

More than likely, if you’ve exposed your relative, they’ll go into denial and act surprised that you even know the word “groovy”.

There will bean awkward moment of silence, followed by an excuse by the Baby Boomer about something or other, and you can smile that you one-upped your elder.

So this is an open invitation to anybody in their 20s to come forward and tell me your experience if you do this, and I will give you more ammo if you need it!

Time Travel: The Ultimate "DO OVER"

2005-12-09T10:26:00.000-05:00

I’m sure that all of us have wondered if we could do things all over again, we’d do it “X” instead of "Y", when looking back in our memories of the past.

Well, I too have had such thoughts and after giving considerable thought, have come out against the idea – assuming that a technology exists that allow us to do so.

Apparently there is such a technology, and it can be found browsing an interesting site I heard about on the “Coast to Coast AM” radio program called:

http://www.johntitor.com/

Now first for some background information: It is about a guy calling himself “John Titor”, and he claimed to have come here from the year 2036.

“Titor” is thought not to be a real name, but an abbreviation of TImeTravelOR”. (Note the capitalized portion reads “titor”).

He apparently went back to 1975 to retrieve an IBM 5100 series computer that has the ability to read several computer languages, and it can be tweaked to read UNIX. In 2038, there is apparently a problem with a “time out error” that renders problems with UNIX far greater than the Y2K problem, and no IBM 5100 series computer could be found in his future – thus the time travel trip here.

Regardless of whether you believe the above or not, I found that my understanding of time as a dimension has changed and it is closer to being complete than before.

Time is a very weird dimension.

It is never at the same pace even in the same universe, let alone others.

Time is like a river, because it flows one direction. Thus it is easier to go forward than backward, which would require more energy. This fact is one of many that the above site insists is true.

It also insists (actually the alleged time traveler does) that all timelines are not the same length, so time could end without warning.

As a result of the above-cited hyperlink, I have accepted that time is really a multiple dimension filled with many, if not infinite timelines, or “worldlines”, as John Titor called them in his terminology.

Because of this multiple-timeline reality, then the grandfather paradox – i.e., that you can go back in time and kill your grandfather and shouldn’t exist – is impossible.

There were other things as well, that I’ve accepted as quite plausible and I gave considerable weight to them.

He said that the divergence between timelines was about 2% (2.5% in his machine). This means that all timelines may be similar, but outcomes will vary. This implies that even with a 2% divergence, future events will tend to diverge as well.

Also, the time traveler of this site said that yes, you could meet the other “you” there and actually have a conversation. With multiple timelines, the universe wouldn’t experience some sort of quantum flux or distortion. It is quite possible to see the other you, have a conversation and so on.

But this is digressing too far.

I will rephrase the question not, “If I had it to do all over again, would you?” to “Should you do it all over again, if you could?”

Here’s why:

Let’s say that you could build a time machine based on what you saw and copied from that website above and get to function properly.

Here again is a problem – getting it to function properly. You may wind up somewhere that you didn’t expect with no way to get back.

What if your time machine broke down on the way to your proposed “do-over”?

Would you be able to fix it? And where would you go for help when that happens without people thinking you’re crazy? This is something to think about before you embark upon such a journey.

And don’t carry any money with you from your present time. What good would $1000 be in Year 2005 money if you’re going back to 1985?

So what would you use as money? After, you’re going to need something to buy things with. You can’t go anywhere without spending – be it a different place in space OR in time either.

I thought about this. The answer is gold. Use gold as your currency. Convert some of your present cash in your present timeline into gold. That will enable you use gold as a currency – for it would be universally accepted anywhere, if you’ll pardon the pun about the word “universally”. Just make sure there is no time stamp on any of the gold ingots.

(Note: is there anybody out there that can tell me whether time-stamping gold ingots is a common practice? And thus you’d have to melt them down and recast them without evidence of your origin?)

Note also that gold would be heavier than paper money and thus require more energy expended for your trip. Take this into account in the planning of your trip.

Then there are other operational problems.

It might be useful to expand my personal thoughts on how far back I wished to go to explain this hypothetical (or not so) time travel trip.

I once wished to return to the year 1984 – 21 years ago. I was dabbling in stock market speculation and made many costly errors as well as some stunning successes. It is the errors I wished to correct in order to make me rich, and not the collapse of fortune that I suffered instead. It is the idea that knowing what I know now would aid me in going back in time and rewriting history, as it were.

But there’s a major problem. You will encounter the past “you” in that slightly divergent timeline. How are you going to assume your past “you’s” identity? Remember that you are going to have to establish a bona fide identity of your own.

What would you do if a time-traveling “you” came up to you and tried to convince you to trade places? Wouldn’t you be suspicious as to why?

Why would you want to switch places with your you from the future? If it were so great in the future, why is this other you so eager to switch with you?

And then recall that I would be hard-pressed to explain why I am now 53 years old and not the 32-year-old – 21 years ago. How do you explain THAT to your family?

Assuming that the other you was willing to trade places, make sure he gets the key to your residence and your bank account information and phone numbers and some background information on all the people you know in your time, or else he’d be lost in your time.

Worse still, assuming he accepted such a trading places and he takes your time machine and goes forward to your place, he may not reach your exact timeline and then have to convince another you to switch places, right?

So that’s the way to approach this possibility: what would you do if another you from another timeline came here from the future and wanted to switch with you?

This isn’t a theoretical question –any more. You’d have to be prepared for such a possibility because a switch to another timeline wouldn’t in your best interest. But we can agree that a switch by the time traveling you WOULD definitely be in HIS best interest.

But there is another problem too. I currently weigh much more than I did back then, and my weight has ballooned up and down over the years. Assuming you could safely pass as the different you on the target timeline, how do you explain your extra bulk? I do recall that I was in shape back then, and the same problem in reverse would happen for the you that might entertain switching places with you.

Problem again: how would you deal with talking to another “you”, regardless of whether you are the time traveler or the target person in the divergent timeline?

Also, consider your purpose for the time travel. You are assuming that there is only one timeline – zero divergence – and that armed with whatever information you now have, that you could profit handsomely.

NOT SO FAST!

Remember what I said about divergent timelines – even 2% different?

How do you know that same result will happen in the target timeline?

For example, let’s take the recent Super Bowl win by New England Patriots in early 2005 in which the result was a 3-point win.

If your purpose for the time travel was betting on sports outcomes and you took sports reference books or papers with you, how do you know that they would still be valid with a 2% divergence?

If there is a 2% or 2½% divergence – or if your time machine missed your target and wound up farther than a 2% divergence, you may be in trouble.

We already know that betting is based upon point spreads. If the outcome of the Super Bowl was slightly different, say New England wins by 6 points, and you took Philadelphia Eagles plus 3 points, you’d lose!

Good advice: don’t bet it all on one horse.

Also, say you could be successful in a new timeline, assuming that you convinced the other “you” to switch places. Since timelines aren’t the same length, and time could end without warning, how do you know how long you have to enjoy a success that you cheated somebody else from?

And how do you explain this to God when Judgment Day comes?

Suppose that you do get unearned success by cheating, traveling back in time and utilizing historical data that come true in the target timeline as well as your original timeline.

What control do you have over other events? What if local time unfolds differently around you? An accidental probability (and I mean an “accident” in the true sense of the word) that wouldn’t otherwise have happened before could now happen.

There are lots of ways I could go with this, but your future is fundamentally changed, even though general events might not.

You assume that things would be better if you changed timelines. You don’t know that for sure. If the divergence is 2% (or more), then everything that depends on outcomes at the margin – i.e., stock market speculation – would be wrong!

Just think of things that could go wrong and what Murphy’s Law has to say. You’d be all alone in a new timeline 20 years older than the “you” that you replaced. Say you messed up on speculative bets on stocks, bonds, commodities, sports scores or whatever.

Now you’re worse off than if you’d never had left your original timeline!

Then what do you do?

All the sports reference data or future outcomes you brought with you on the time travel trip are useless now because they happened in a different timeline. Now you’ll have to actually work to succeed on your own merits.

And isn’t that what you ought to be doing (or would have been doing) in your own timeline – earning your keep?

Is the easy way – greed – worth the risk? I don’t think so.

This has made me think carefully again about “do-over” – if I could.

They say that everything happens for a reason. Read this entire post carefully should you ever wish to attempt to “do-over”.

I think that there really ARE multiple timelines in order for paradoxes NOT to happen.

God knew what He was doing when he made the universe(s?) and time itself.

Dirty Democrat Deeds Done Dirt Cheap

2005-09-30T20:48:00.000-04:00

Dirty deeds are being done dirt cheap because the Left can’t win elections any more, but eventually, the truth will come out.

This is nothing more than a political vendetta against a conservative by a frustrated left in the form of an increasingly left-leaning Democrat Party controlled by the kook fringe.

Indictment of Republican Tom DeLay a serious blow for Bush agenda

BETH GORHAM

WASHINGTON (CP) - In a serious blow for President George W. Bush, powerful Republican Tom DeLay was forced to step down Wednesday as House majority leader to face a conspiracy charge in a Texas campaign finance scheme.

Bush, who relied on DeLay's tough style to push policy, is already having a tough time dealing with a party beleaguered by the weak response to hurricane Katrina and divided over how to pay for a massive rebuilding project.

Now DeLay's indictment after years of pushing ethical boundaries provides an opportunity for Democrats to pound Republicans on corruption issues in the run-up to next year's congressional elections.

Why should he have ever stepped down in the first place? Apparently, the Right doesn’t seem to realize that the other side – the loony Left – is in all-out battle for their survival and they will try to hole their enemy to the rules while bending, flexing and falsifying the rules to their own benefit.

And what ethical boundaries did Tom DeLay push?

Is this what it has come down to? The “Demon-crats” can’t win elections so they have to start to play dirty to try and bring down ethical people just to try to hope that those stupid electorate voters see things their way. YUP! That’s what they think of you – the voting public – that you are stupid for not voting for them!

DeLay, know as "the Hammer" on Capitol Hill, came out swinging and proclaimed his innocence after word broke that a Texas grand jury charged him and two associates with violating a law banning corporate contributions to state candidates.

The charge came after a long investigation by Democratic district attorney Ronald Earle that DeLay has always portrayed as a political witch hunt.

"I have done nothing wrong," said DeLay, calling Earle a "rogue prosecutor" and a "partisan fanatic."

"I am innocent," he said. "This is one of the weakest, most baseless indictments in American history. It's a sham."

Said Earle: "My job is to prosecute felonies. I'm doing my job."

Republicans expressed support for DeLay as they selected Roy Blunt from Missouri, the current party whip in the House, to fill in temporarily.

Nowhere in this part of the story does it mention that the charges brought forth were from Travis County – a Democrat Party haven – from where the “forged” memos about G W Bush’s absence of Air National Guard Service originated.

Were the mainstream media ever curious about this? No, they weren’t, because their whole agenda and template is to get the sitting president and people surrounding him who are conservative, and the devil take the hindquarter, right or wrong. Their ultimate aim to take down this democratically-elected leader no matter the cost.

I warned many people long ago that the Left, in its desperate bid to stay relevant – would pull out all the stops to try to take down its opposition.

And no expense would be spared in doing so.

It wouldn’t surprise me if the leftists tried to assassinate an opponent. They haven’t yet done so, but the time when it does get attempted is shortening because the Left is desperate and will try anything. They will eventually shoot first and ask questions later, after they first remove the trigger locks that they enacted through gun-control legislation.

The White House also stuck by DeLay, calling him "a good ally, a leader who we have worked closely with to get things done for the American people."

"I think the president's view is that we need to let the legal process work," said press secretary Scott McClellan.

DeLay, who will keep his seat representing Houston suburbs, vowed he'll be back, saying Democrats won't be able to disrupt the party's agenda.

But some analysts don't see it that way, especially since Republicans have other high-profile ethical concerns.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist is facing questions about the timing of a stock sale in a family-owned business.

Karl Rove, White House chief of staff, has been embroiled in controversy over the outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame.

And a top federal procurement officer appointed by Bush was arrested this month on charges that he made false statements and obstructed a federal investigation into a golfing junket arranged by lobbyist Jack Abramoff.

DeLay, 58, has long been at the centre of controversy. He was admonished three times last year by the House ethics committee for his conduct on three separate issues.

Now a Senate panel is pursuing his ties to Abramoff and questions about who paid the bills for DeLay's expensive overseas travel.

"The Republicans can't focus right now," said Charles Cushman, a politics professor at George Washington University.

"You've got this swirling set of accusations about greed, corruption and graft. This is going to follow them right up to the 2008 election. It's going to hurt a lot."

Now here is more proof positive that the Left is desperate to try to hold onto power by attacking those who were duly elected or appointed by those who were.

I had not even read the rest of the article to this point yet I was able to figure the stupidity of the Liberal, Leftist mindset.

For them to have to go to court and try to unseat duly elected and duly appointed officials speaks dramatically of their desperation and their own corruption. If they were so worthy of high office, then why didn’t the voters elect them instead?

For that reason, all this will come and fall on deaf ears. Then will come the attempts at assassination by those on the Left.

Democrat Nancy Pelosi, House minority leader, was quick off the mark Wednesday.

"The criminal indictment . . . is the latest example that Republicans in Congress are plagued by a culture of corruption at the expense of the American people," she said in a statement.

AHA! It’s Democrat Nancy Pelosi (a.k.a. “Nazi Peloser”) who is quick off the mark.

I wonder why.

Could it be that she doesn’t want any attention to the rampant and blatant corruption within her own fascist-wannabe party?

Or could it be that “Nazi Peloser” doesn’t want it to be too scrutinized that her own Demoncrat Party has no ideas whatsoever, and they haven’t for years?

And could it be that all the Demoncrats can do is criticize, criticize, criticize …

…. without ever having to offer a solution of their own … because they have NONE?

AND THAT THEY ARE AFRAID OF THEIR OWN CHANCES OR SURVIVAL?

So that THEY GO ON THE ATTACK, HOPING THAT NOBODY NOTICES THEIR OWN FALSE PREMISES, AND THEIR OWN RESPONSIBILITY IN ALL OF THIS?

Big Government's Days Are Coming To An End

2005-09-23T22:22:00.000-04:00

The future of big government and its days of reckoning the world over is almost upon us.

All of you should be alarmed. Don’t be complacent. You can’t afford to be any longer.

Don’t wish for some magical way out. I’m not buying the “don’t worry, be happy” line I’m hearing around the DC Beltway.

It doesn’t matter who is power in D.C. The GOP is presently in power and yet they have come to enjoy power and are spending tax money just as the Democrats did before them. I doubt that anything will be any different if the Libertarians get control because big government power is too alluring – the way it is presently set up. It’s corruptive.

Taken as a total, unfounded, future government obligations amount to an astounding total of over $46 trillion. Yes, you read that right. And with each passing year where a “good” year for Social Security (one where pay-in money exceeds payouts) is replaced with a “bad” year (the opposite), this amount of future obligations will grow worse.

Over a 20, even 30 year span of longer, there is just no way that the economy can grow out of this mess. At present, we have an $11 trillion dollar economy. To fully fund over $46 trillion in future obligations, the economy will have to grow to a size of $72 trillion in at least 30 years. To get there, a domestic economy will have to grow at a rate of 6.75% per year for the next 30 years.

That will be clearly impossible. Even during the late Clinton Administration years, the economy could only sustain a 6% growth rate for barely half a year.

There is no way anybody can sustain that kind of white-hot economic growth for 30 years unless the nation is a 3^rd World, developing nation. Certainly a developed, Western nation with a mature economy can’t do it.

That means that Big Government will have to renege on its promises and obligations. It will first apply band-aid fixes to programs like Social Security where the retirement age gets higher and payouts get smaller. It will then get to the point where the Feds will just wash their hands of it and say, “Sorry, we don’t have your money”.

The Welfare State politics’ heyday is over. It found ways to spend more and more. It found ways to borrow more to spend even more. The problem is that they forgot that borrowed money has to be paid back sometime.

At this amount of debt in the tens of trillions, expect that default will happen.

The above calculations assume that future obligations will stay at $46 trillion and not increase. They will not remain steady or fall. Even if you adjust figures and assume a higher debt load as a percentage of the economy to 100%, you still cannot grow your way out of spending in a welfare state. The propensity of a welfare state is to spend even money they don’t have or can’t collect through increased taxes.

This spells trouble for the future. Big Government will not go away even when the writing is on the wall and is obvious for all to see. They will fight tooth and nail to survive and they will not be deterred by bloodshed.

If they can’t find a way to make excuses to spend money and tax the public, they will not be above violence to exist. And I mean violence against their own subjects – uh, I meant citizens – or will there be such a term in the future?

What good will paper currency be in the future? Already the world is awash in dollars. There will come a time when our foreign creditors will not accept dollars for payment and stop buying government bonds. If they do that, future government growth will halt very quickly when liquidity dries up. They will demand real, hard assets for payment instead of paper.

And this is starting to happen. China recently put in an all-cash bid for the Unocal Oil Company. This startled Congress that the Chinese was targeting Unocal and even Maytag for acquisition. They relented, but that was a mistake on both parties.

The next time you see China make a bid for a well-known American company and our currency is in serious decline, they will be successful because they will threaten not to buy government bonds in a depreciating currency. If this 40% supply of buyers dries up, how will government manage to sell its bonds which finance the ever-growing deficit?

And how do you protect yourself from a greedy government that will find a way to try and deplete your wallet of your savings – that is, if you have any?

Don’t expect to hoard gold or other precious metals as an inflation hedge and hope that the government won’t know. The ways and means that they have to get your money if you have any, are greater than at any time in history. In fact, (unconstitutional) laws are still on the books that give Congress the power to seize gold from private citizens. It was never repealed.

And if you think this is paranoia, then consider the eminent domain case just this year of Kelo v. City of New London. For the first time ever, this process of eminent domain was used to take away properties of private citizens to give to another private citizen, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals – and all because the original private owners weren’t paying enough in property taxes! That’s what it boiled down to.

The U.S. Supreme Court sided with government in direct violation of the 5^th Amendment “takings” clause. A taking was intended to be private land for public use – not because the future prospective property owner, another private but corporate citizen could bring in more tax revenue for local government to spend.

And consider also that recently, the nation of Israel – a democracy, they say – forcibly expelled its own citizens from the Gaza Strip from land they legitimately bought at fair market prices and transformed from desert into blooming land and had 11% of all Israeli agricultural exports therefrom. This is the first time that citizens of a democracy were forced from their homes ever!

This trend of desperate governments is worldwide. Don’t think it can’t happen here.

There will be blood in the streets. Governments will fight dirty. Paper currency will fail every time its value is no longer tied to a hard asset like gold or silver, as it has in the past histories of paper currency. If you have gold, silver, platinum or other similar hard assets, get them to safety in a tax haven like Switzerland or else risk its forfeiture to a greedy government desperate to keep alive.

There might even be an attempt to charge a per-head tax – which is a lump sum that each individual would pay per year. It is regressive because it would hurt the poor most.

Or there may be a renewed attempt to attack those with wealth and new ways to confiscate and/or redistribute it in the name of fairness – translation: it will go to government and not poor people.

Of course, none of this will bother the leftists. They look upon Big Government as their god in their political “theology”. The bigger the government, the better and the more likely that the biggest government will be the leftists’ chief deity. Today, it is the United Nations – because their former god – the Soviet Union is dead.

The Left isn’t deterred by bloodshed. In fact, they have avidly and happily supported and made excuses for all manner of dictators in the past century and today. Like a ditzy gun moll babe attracted to gangsters, so too are the leftists attracted to dictatorships and the power they wield because basically, powerful governments are their false gods.

And their delusion will not be shattered until their false gods – big governments – come tumbling down and every leftist is rightfully executed and/or brought to justice for THEIR crimes against humanity.

My guess is that the Leftists will die hard, and I hope they do bring everything down upon themselves. I will not be disappointed, because they cling to a delusional worldview despite all truth pointing the way in the opposite direction.

There will be no reform movement within the Left because there simply isn’t a structure within the leftist realm of politics worth saving. There are no new ideas, no new leaders and no brilliant thinkers remaining in the leftist realm of politics.

The Leftist record is all too well documented to be refuted or denied, so hence the Left has gone into a state of denial as well.

And if the Left, or agents of Big Government still exist, they will try to survive and exist by ANY means necessary – and that means that they will not be afraid to desperate things – like killing innocent civilian population inhabitants – and making excuses for its continued existence.

Trust me: the Big Left, to the extent that it will exist, will fight dirty and drop all pretenses as to moral superiority. And they will try to fly that trial balloon for anybody foolish enough to believe it.

When you create a monster as big as a huge bureaucracy like that in government, they won’t roll over and die. They will be forced to and try to blame others for their own mistakes known as “policy”.

It will be like a siren song like that of the Greek Myths and Ulysses and his voyage. Don’t let yourself listen to the siren song or else you’ll go down with them too.

The Left, unfortunately, also knows that their time is at an end. They crazily hope for some strange miracle to save them from extinction/execution that they rightfully deserve.

But even they are not so delusional as to not see the things that are happening that are so detrimental to their existence. Because of this, don’t be surprised when they resort to bloodshed. It never deterred them before when Stalin was in power, or any manner of totalitarian dictator since then.

Whatever they say, consider it a siren song of deceit, and by the way:

Make sure you have guns and lots of ammunition – and don’t be afraid to use it. They will slander you anyway if you use them. So kill the police or other law enforcement agencies if they come for you in the name of left-wing theology, because they’ll kill you anyways.

I guarantee that they will.

They are playing this game for keeps. That much the Left understands, no matter how warped the rest of their worldview is, they still understand survival and existence.

I wouldn’t even be surprised if they used your own family members as hostages against you just to justify their own survival and existence. But don’t give in because if they resort to that low level, your relatives, your loved ones are finished anyway. That’s what Saddam Hussein did – and the Left WILL do too, because they worship Big Government and the power it brings.

Does this sound paranoid?

Laugh if you will, but the time is coming – sooner than you think – when all this can become a reality. You’d better be prepared to fight dirty with dirty, because when it comes down to survival, the Left WILL go the low road.

But there is good news too.

Even dictators claim to act on behalf of the people and need their support.

But even Stalin never had enough law enforcement Gestapo to carry out his wishes. Neither did Hitler have enough and neither do any dictators anywhere now or in the foreseeable future. The masses always outnumber the small power elite, and if the masses have simply had enough, there is no way that the repressionist regimes have enough ammunition to kill you all. Even if they did, what would they have left to rule?

The regimes that use repression are counting upon your fear, and if you laugh at them and don’t fear them, they are powerless – despite the attempts by them in the controlled media to fix the way the reality is viewed in their nations.

It is up to you – the people – to have the destiny you desire.

You alone can defeat an evil leader and have him replaced.

Even if the means isn’t available domestically to depose an evil leader, enough international outrage will be generated to depose evil, as happened in the case of Iraq, and will succeed despite the dictator-worshiping leftists who camouflage themselves as objective journalists, when all they really do is promote their own hatred of a duly-elected American president twice and their sanction of dictatorship as the effeminate gun molls that they really are.

The recent hurricane disaster – Katrina – that has devastated New Orleans and is now projected to cost the feds an additional $200 billion in recovery spending puts another nail in the coffin to the concept of Big Government.

Where will they come up with the money to pay for the reconstruction?

And as of the time of this writing, Hurricane Rita also threatens to do even further damage to areas of Texas/Louisiana. How many more billions of dollars will this add? And where will the money come from to pay for this?

And then the next hurricane-damaged areas? The season isn’t even over yet.

Ironically, these natural disasters stand to prop up government, if the money to pay for the cleanup comes from taking spending away from a slew of pork-barrel projects currently approved in Congressional bills. If this is the road taken by Big Government, it will be a step in the right direction.

Either way, the days when Big Government could spend whatever amount whenever it wanted to, are coming to an end. It has seemingly took a natural disaster to force Big Government’s focus on its profligate ways.

The bottom line is that TRUTH will always come to the forefront.

NOW is the time and age that it WILL happen.

More Leftist Stupidity

2005-09-21T04:50:00.000-04:00

Just below is a further example of the Leftist stupidity:

(As usual, my “color commentary” is in different color type!)

Protesters draw link between Katrina and Iraq war

President George W. Bush's faltering performance after Hurricane Katrina, like his decision to invade Iraq, show his priorities are at odds with actions needed to keep Americans safe, anti-war protesters said on Monday.

Faltering performance? I don’t think so. In the questions I’ve seen in polls, the way it is presented, the polls are so worded as to not give the respondent the option of saying even more action is required, as opposed to less action like, say, a total troop withdrawal from Iraq altogether.

And there’s a reason: because if it can be shown that Americans want the government to stop pussyfooting around and take out the terrorists once and for all, then the entire premise for the poll – that of removing our troops from Iraq in the leftists’ desires – becomes a result that shows that the news media is totally biased and their perspective 100% wrong!

That’s why they will never phrase a poll question in that way because they are out to get President Bush, any way they can.

"One of the bogus reasons that George Bush gives for this invasion (and) occupation of Iraq is to make America safer -- and Katrina exposed that clearly he has made America more vulnerable through his policies in Iraq," anti-war activist and bereaved mother Cindy Sheehan told a morning news conference.

U.S. troops fighting an unexpectedly stubborn insurgency in Iraq should come home to help face domestic challenges like the unprecedented humanitarian relief and recovery effort on the Gulf Coast, said the activists, who will stage a march on Washington this weekend.

This is the same Cindy Sheehan who proudly said an anti-Semitic remark, and whose son defied her liberal views. Bereaved mother? I don’t think so. She is a total wacko and a tool of the leftists to try to unseat a duly elected president of the United States.

When Sheehan later spoke in Manhattan's Union Square to a group of about 200 anti-war protesters, New York police broke up the rally and arrested a man over a dispute about whether their permit allowed amplified sound.

200 protestors? Is that all this wacko, bereaved mother can get in New York City, where over 8 million people live? Where is the groundswell of support that the news media likes to try to portray that this wacko bereaved mother has? Only 200? That’s the leftist, liberal propaganda machine for you!

And this is supposedly responsible for the negative numbers for GW Bush’s Iraq policy?

Something is not right here, and I’ll bet it’s the leftist’s portrayal of events/reality!

Morrigan Phillips, spokeswoman for the Bring Them Home Now Tour, which has been stopping in towns across America on its way to the march in Washington, said the arrest was the first since the group began its campaign earlier this summer.

Leaders of the coalition organizing the September 24-26 protest in Washington include Sheehan, who gained international fame by camping out for weeks outside Bush's ranch in Crawford, Texas.

The anti-war group United for Peace and Justice, spearheading the march on Washington, said National Guard troops and materiel deployed in Iraq were needed to respond to the tragedy in and around New Orleans.

Sheehan is the star attraction for the three-day protest, which will include nonviolent acts of civil disobedience at the White House and an interfaith religious service, organizers said.

After her soldier son Casey was killed in Iraq, Sheehan demanded to meet with Bush while he vacationed in Texas so he could explain why U.S. troops were not being withdrawn from Iraq.

Bush, who had met briefly with Sheehan on a previous occasion, has declined to meet with her again.

"We were alarmed to hear the first company to get a contract in the rebuilding of New Orleans was Halliburton, another nonbid contract," said Leslie Cagan of United for Peace and Justice, which bills itself as the largest anti-war coalition in the United States.

Aha! The plot thickens. SO let’s take a look at this “United For Peace And Justice” anti-war group. I Googled the name and came up with their web site and took a look at their “member groups”, and lo and behold, I found “ANSWER”, and many other leftist wacko groups a part of it all.

These are the ones who hate Israel and who either knowingly or unknowingly, support the genocide of Jews within Israel – the only true, documented and provable REAL natives to that land which the Romans bastardized into the name “Palestine”, which is better known as “Philistine”, a race of giants which the Israelites defeated centuries ago, and the Romans sought to rub it into the face of the Jews because of their rebellion against them.

The largest U.S. contractor in Iraq, Halliburton Co.'s subsidiary Kellogg Brown and Root has been given a $29.8 million contract to rebuild Navy bases along the Katrina-battered Gulf Coast.

Vice President Dick Cheney is a former head of Halliburton, whose subsidiary secured no-bid contracts in Iraq after the United States toppled Saddam Hussein.

So what? All politicians place and business interests into a “blind trust” so they can’t take advantage of their position in a conflict of interest. But that fact is conveniently forgotten to be mentioned in the article.

By the way: what other competitors exist to Halliburton that could do the job? Was there ever any mention of any here in this article? What efforts were made by the writer and editors of this trashy article to see if there were, or were not? Or did they just go by a preconceived notion of hatred toward the present presidential administration?

We’ll not know for sure, but if the research on this topic within this article is as sloppy as the rest of this pathetic piece of journalist drivel, then you may be assured that I asked a good question and you may be pleased that I exposed you to truth for a change.

Oh, by the way again: about those no-bid contracts.

They were for the rebuilding of infrastructure that the enemy destroyed – and very often under enemy fire – and they are the only company that has a division that does what they do, and has done since at least World War 2. That is why they get a no-bid contract. There is simply nobody else around to do the job but Halliburton.

Imagine having to rebuild a bridge across a river that the enemy destroyed to despoil your troops’ advance. And further imagine that while your rebuild that bridge, the enemy is firing upon you. THAT is what Halliburton does. And they are the only one who does what they do.

Just imagine how much you have to pay civil engineers to work under those conditions when they know that their lives are on the line. Apparently, the leftists can’t, and they certainly don’t have compassion for the widows and orphans who could be left behind should any of these brave individuals die in the heat of combat.

As for New Orleans, what better company could you have but Halliburton, who could rebuild necessary infrastructure in a region devastated by a natural disaster, except for one that has been battle-tested under far more adverse conditions?

Louisiana Governor Is A Mass Murderer

2005-09-14T00:51:00.000-04:00

Sometimes, mass murderers sit in elected office.

(My “color” commentary follows, as usual, to show you truth. Be courageous enough to accept truth when you see it.)

Governor Defends Louisiana's 'Exit Plan'

Louisiana had a "well thought-out exit plan" in the days before Hurricane Katrina, and many more lives would have been lost without it, Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco said Sunday.

"There was not a single individual taking a slow step in our state," Blanco said at the Reliant Center, where more than 2,000 evacuees are living after fleeing the devastation in New Orleans.

City, state and federal governments have been criticized for delays in evacuations and delivery of supplies, widespread communication difficulties, and law enforcement breakdowns in New Orleans that led to looting and violence.

Blanco insisted the state had an evacuation-and-rescue effort that prevented thousands more deaths.

This is an outright, bald-faced lie by an elected official who was one of several in Louisiana who NEVER executed their “well-thought-out” evacuation plan.

This is merely a “covering your ass” approach by the governor responsible for making the hurricane deaths possible.

It was her State Homeland Security Office that prevented Red Cross truckloads of food and water from entering New Orleans because they didn’t want this to act as magnet for more people to come in. They wanted evacuation instead.

So they allowed thousands to starve and dehydrate instead!

Sadly, this same story is being told by other private relief agencies as well.

Blanco insisted the state had an evacuation-and-rescue effort that prevented thousands more deaths.

"Were there lessons learned? You bet," she said in a tense 14-minute explanation after being asked to elaborate on Louisiana's storm plans.

"We did a massive evacuation, and if we hadn't we would have had thousands of deaths. Right now, the numbers are minimal when you consider the amount of damage."

Cover-your-ass mode is the de facto response in the Louisiana Governor’s Office right now. They made a deliberate, calculated decision to stop relief supplies getting into New Orleans, and it backfired in their faces.

As she has before, Blanco, a Democrat, refused to blame President Bush, a Republican.

"Help in those critical moments was slow in coming, not through any fault of the president," she said.

Of course she can’t blame the president. Her fingerprints are all over the cookie jar. She is afraid of the truth coming out, as soon it will, that the State of Louisiana is the prime culprit for the deaths of the Hurricane Katrina flood victims.

The truth will also come out that the State diverted the money given them from levee improvements for other spending programs – money that the Democrats claim was cut 40% for levee improvements.

And during all the rush of the mainstream press to blame the President, it has since come out that it wasn’t the levee that broke, but the sea wall – which isn’t on any list for construction improvements. So it wouldn’t have mattered had the money to improve levees been used for that purpose instead of being diverted to other spending programs.

I live in a state where hurricanes have a history of making landfall on a regular basis. Yet there seems to be no problem with FEMA over here. They are already on the spot as the newest – Hurricane Ophelia is making landfall.

So why is Louisiana having such problems when North Carolina isn’t?

SO THERE you have it: the Governor of Louisiana allowed those people to die. If a private citizen killed that many people, he or she would be called a mass murderer.

Governor Kathleen Blanco: do the right thing now and resign.

You Want THESE Guys Running Things?

2005-09-12T06:39:00.000-04:00

I don’t recall anything like this happening when Israel ran the Gaza Strip. It seems only to have happened right after the forced eviction of Jews from the legitimate settlements in land that they bought and paid for at market prices.

And the world wants THESE guys to run the place?

Do they look like somebody you can trust to make peace with Israel?

They can’t even be in harmony with themselves, let alone their declared mortal enemy, Israel. So where is this idyllic love, peace and harmony and “grooviness” that I heard tell once the Israelis pulled out of Gaza?

So on with the AP story (and my commentary in color type translates):

Abbas to Hunt Security Chief's Killers

By IBRAHIM BARZAK, Associated Press Writer (Sep 7, 2005)

Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas vowed to hunt down the killers of a powerful former security chief whose gangland-style slaying Wednesday laid bare Gaza's raging power struggles just days before Israel hands over control of the coastal territory.

In a brazen challenge to Abbas, a shadowy militant group claimed responsibility for killing Moussa Arafat, cousin of the late Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat, in a burst of gunfire.

Adding to the tension, the Israeli military said the vital Rafah crossing point between Gaza and Egypt would be closed Thursday until further notice as part of Israel's Gaza pullout, which could be completed as early as Monday.

About 100 masked militants stormed Moussa Arafat's heavily guarded home in an upscale Gaza City neighborhood early Wednesday, sparking a 30-minute gunbattle with dozens of his bodyguards. The assailants burst into the home, dragged out Arafat in his pajamas and gunned him down in the dusty street.

Arafat's oldest son, Manhal, a senior security commander, was kidnapped by the gunmen. Officials said negotiations, brokered by Egyptian security officials, were under way to secure his release.

Isn’t life groovy in the Gaza Strip now that the Israelis have forced those 10,000 evil settlers out of supposedly Arab land? Aren’t those supposed Palestinians holding hands and singing “Kumbaya”?

I don’t recall any political assassination happening before when Israel was in control. Maybe it was all a mistake to unilaterally disengage from Gaza. There was at least law and order when Jews ran the place.

The killing raised new questions about the Palestinian Authority's ability to take control of Gaza after Israel completes its pullout next week.

It occurred a block from the headquarters of the Palestinian Preventive Security Service, which failed to respond, and 400 yards from Abbas' Gaza residence, where he was spending the night.

Palestinian officials said they viewed the killing as an attack on the government. "This is a very dangerous act," said Palestinian Prime Minister Ahmed Qureia.

Abbas met with top security officials, placed his forces on high alert and said he would track down the killers. "This crime does not stop his efforts to maintain law and order," said a statement issued by Abbas' office.

New questions? No, these were questions that should have been asked well before the unilateral disengagement took place. What the world had as a model was the way that the PLO ran the West Bank when control was given the PA. When Arafat’s thugs tool over, they ran the economy into the ground – dropping domestic GDP by 90% within a year while Arafat went about looting his own people to enrich himself and this band of thugs.

This was entirely foreseeable had the wishful thinkers of the world – those anti-Semitic types that hate Israel and think that they are the cause for lack of peace – taken off their rose-colored glasses and saw things as they really were, and not the way they wished.

With his security forces severely weakened after years of fighting with Israel, Abbas faces a formidable task. Armed gangs roam freely in many parts of Gaza, and rival militant groups are engaged in a bitter power struggle with Abbas' ruling Fatah movement ahead of the Israeli pullout.

No. Abbas wasn’t weakened by Israel. He was weak right from the start, and what happened to Abbas, he did to himself. He was never a popular man even when Yasser Arafat was alive.

Years of corruption in Fatah's ranks during the reign of Yasser Arafat, who died last year, have further weakened Abbas' standing.

The Popular Resistance Committees, a group made up largely of disaffected Fatah members, claimed responsibility for the killing. The group said it killed Arafat, a prominent Fatah member, to punish him for alleged corruption.

"We have implemented God's law," said a spokesman, Mohammed Abdel Al, adding that Arafat "was responsible for killing, stealing and blackmail." He said his group would resist arrest or any attempt to be disarmed.

Moussa Arafat had many enemies and was the target of frequent corruption allegations. Abbas fired him as Gaza security chief several months ago, demoting him to a symbolic position of military adviser.

This act is just a foretaste of what is to come. Old scores and enmities are being settled. That’s what this is all about. I wonder how rose-colored-glasses-wearing peaceniks will do to try to blame this on Israel. You know somehow they will try. The only trouble is, there is no Israeli there to use as a convenient scapegoat!

Israel has long called on Abbas to disarm Palestinian militant groups. Israeli officials said the killing provided a test for Abbas, and said future peace talks would depend on the Palestinian leader's ability to rein in militants.

"There is no taboo after this assassination and no one of the Palestinian leaders has immunity anymore," said Israeli Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom. "It shows once again the necessity to collect the illegal weapons and to dismantle the infrastructure of terrorist organizations."

Vice Premier Shimon Peres, a longtime peace advocate, warned that if Abbas' forces cannot bring Gaza under control, "it will be very difficult to continue with the peace process."

Ah yes, Shimon Peres, one of the leaders of the Israeli leftists, has decided to speak up and try to act like he’s so Moderate and reasonable, like the Leftists are “above the fray” and somehow the voice of reason.

The truth is, they are none of the sort. The failed Oslo Accords are proof of that because the recognition of legitimacy to Arab claims to rightful Jewish land was a surrender of morality that precipitated the intifada and started the suicide bombers – which never happened prior to a concession of land for a “Palestinian state”.

Besides, there was no way before that weapons were being stopped. Now, with an open airport and a new seaport being constructed, there will be a virtually unstoppable pipeline of terror about to start upon Israel.

I say “virtually unstoppable” because the only thing that stops it is the act of war and a strong reclamation of Israel to ALL the Holy Land to take back the moral authority which the foolish leftists ceded in the name of peace.

Abbas has avoided confrontation with the militants and instead tried to co-opt them through offers of political participation and jobs in the security forces. At nightfall Wednesday, there were no indications his forces would move against the Popular Resistance Committees.

This is further proof that Abbas was never strong in the first place. He had to look strong by parroting the official PLO party line that it wants a “liquidation of the Zionist presence” and a land “from the (Jordan) river to the (Mediterranean) Sea”.

All Abbas (a.k.a. Abu Mazen) could do before is to appease the hardliners – who in fact represent the mainstream thinking of the population – so that he could retain power as the U.S.- and world-anointed “moderate”, or in other words, a “nice terrorist”, with whom the world could do business with!

Awww, ain’t that cute? Abbas is a “nice” terrorist. Doesn’t that make you feel all warm and cuddly inside? Too bad that warmth is coming from the oozing of your own blood as the Islamofascists see the Western moderates and leftists as useful idiots and suckers.

Amid the violence, Israeli officials said the Cabinet would vote Sunday to authorize the withdrawal of the final troops remaining in Gaza. Officials said the withdrawal could be complete as early as Monday — days ahead of a Sept. 15 target.

In preparation for the speeded-up timetable, the Israeli military said the Rafah crossing would be closed Thursday until further notice, just as Cabinet ministers proposed arrangements that could include foreign observers instead of Israeli officers when it is reopened.

The crossing is the only Palestinian land link from Gaza to the outside world without crossing Israel. Israel insists on maintaining control over the flow of cargo and people in and out of Gaza for security reasons, while the Palestinians demand open access to revive Gaza's economy.

Revive Gaza’s economy? There was really not that much wrong with it before, until the control passed to the PA/PLO, who made a wreck of things to begin with.

The only reason that the PLO doesn’t want Israeli eyes to watch is because they don’t people to see how many arms they are smuggling into the tentative new terrorist state being planned in Gaza. They don’t anybody looking over their shoulders.

Well, what is it they’ve done that deserves the trust of the world? What concessions have THEY made, while Israel was coerced and cajoled into making further concessions in the name of a fraudulent peace?

Does Article 15 of the PLO Charter still exist? Yes. Nobody seems to have pressured the Arabs into renouncing it. SO why should they unilaterally do so, when the mortal enemy, Israel, is doing all the work of practically giving them land without firing a shot and making zero concessions?

Yet with this great, heavy-handed advantage of the peace-wishful, anti-Semitic world smiling upon the PLO and Hamas, what do they do?

They fight among themselves!

What excuse will the world make to blame Jews for THIS assassination?

The latest Israeli proposal raises the possibility that Israel would eventually agree to free movement of Palestinians across the border under the supervision of foreign inspectors, without an Israeli presence.

However, officials said the plan would involve closing the Rafah crossing for at least six months. During that time, Israel would retain control of Gaza's access points.

The plan still needs approval by the Israeli Cabinet on Sunday, and defense officials said there would be two days of intensive negotiations with the Palestinians before that.

The rest of the article in the 3 paragraphs just above is totally irrelevant. What does this have to do with the assassination of Yasser Arafat’s cousin, Moussa? Nothing.

It just shows you how foolish and stupid the news media of today are. They don’t get it now, and they will the last to get it – after everybody else has scooped them. They are a bunch of biased leftists that are desperately trying to be relevant in age where they are now useless dinosaurs on their way to extinction.

You almost have to pity them, but I don’t. I laugh at them. They hate that.

Disgraceful Whining

2005-09-05T07:17:00.000-04:00

Normally, all whining is disgraceful, but none more so than what is going on about the higher gasoline prices.

I attribute some of it to the built-in resentment of Big Oil companies, fueled in part by leftist propaganda that enables this hatred.

You can’t blame oil companies for an almost-Category 5 hurricane that smashes into the oil refinery base around southern Louisiana. The problem as of now is supply-based. The hurricane has damaged pipelines and refinery capacity that supplies 30% of domestic oil and fuel needs.

I hear accusations of price gouging, and none of the sort is happening. It is like a sports fan complaining of ticket-scalping prices. This is if of course another issue where whiners love to complain, yet nobody forced a gun to the guy’s head to pay the scalper’s price. That was a clear legal contract that the whiner can easily walk away from. Thus the laws that govern scalping are foolish and derived to protect the fan from his stupidity.

Meanwhile, there is no price gouging going on for gasoline. Prices are higher because of hurricane-related supply disruption. I am simply amazed at the level of economics’ ignorance in the country and of how things work. It is fertile ground for opportunistic politicians of the left who are as ignorant as the public is. They are eager to expand government and thus their power.

Ignorance works in the politicians’ favor. They love uninformed people, and it amazing to witness how quickly public ignorance translates into more government control. All this will have far greater long-term consequences. We are now at the point of having to pay those long-term consequences while having accepted short-term expediency.

Get used to paying higher prices at the gasoline pump for years to come.

There are five reasons why:

Greater global energy demands
Lesser global petroleum supplies
Poor American energy policy decisions
Limited transportation infrastructure
Limited refinery capacity

Let’s start with the last point first. There has been zero new refinery capacity built in the U.S. in the last 15 years. Credit the environmentalists for that one. SO it is irrelevant if you can ship all the oil you need if you can’t refine it quickly enough into useable fuel.

And continuing backwards on the above points, consider the limited transportation bottlenecks. Back when oil prices were much, much lower, the merchant marine oil tanker fleet merely allowed older vessels to decay, retired them and decommissioned them from service. They now have to replace these vessels and there are a considerable number of them to be built. However, to restore the tanker fleet will take ten years of building at the dry docks before there can be enough to remove all the transportation bottlenecks.

So even if there were enough oil refinery capacity, it does no good if there aren’t enough tankers to deliver the petroleum to the intended markets. Every link in the supply chain has to be well coordinated of else price increases happen.

The finally there are demand and supply issues. Let’s start with the demand problem.

All of this I have discussed at length in a previous article on this blog. I have also reprinted the article that explained it once more. But it bears repeating yet again.

New developments and information are available. The situation is even worse than I thought – and this will impact your wallet for years to come.

First, China, India and even Brazil are rapidly developing nations. All of them, but particularly India and China, have rapidly increased energy needs. India alone has doubled its energy requirements in 10 years. India is projected to double its energy needs yet again in 10 years – and THAT’S a conservative estimate.

China and India both have populations in excess of 1 billion each. That’s over one third of the world’s population. Now neither of them has an automobile economy the size of America. At present, there are 350,000,000 motor vehicles the size of cars or larger in the world today. At per capita rates of car ownership in the U.S., this spells higher global fuel prices. If the same rate of vehicle ownership existed in China and India today, that would mean 1,000,000,000 (one billion) vehicles – TRIPLE what exists today!

Just where is the gasoline, diesel or other fuel from petroleum that’s going to power them, come from?

And what will such increased demand mean for petroleum product prices? Even an economic ignoramus could tell you that gasoline prices should triple. SO if we were paying $2 a gallon before, it would be $6 a gallon. Imagine paying $120 to fill a 20-gallon tank in your vehicle.

And that doesn’t even tell the whole story. China and India are rapidly industrializing. Yet Chinese factories aren’t going 24/7 yet. The bottleneck is energy supply. Many Chinese factories have to shut down for lack of electricity because there isn’t enough supply of it. If the Chinese could secure a dependable oil supply and other energy sources, the prices of most goods they produce for consumption in the West would be cheaper still.

And what is China doing about it? China and India are doing far more than America is doing. While politicians here debate an energy policy and talk of conservation, the Chinese and Indians are racing around the globe, courting energy-producing nations and signing long-term energy deals with them. China signed a deal with Canada for oil from its tar sands. The American reaction was: the Canadians backstabbed us!

When you include all the other lesser-populated nations that are rapidly developing as well, this adds up to a permanent increase in the demand for petroleum. That means only one thing: higher fuel prices for years to come!

Things Aren’t THAT Bad – They’re Worse!

Now we get to the supply problem. Some new developments have arisen that should really concern the economically ignorant among you – probably about 60% or more, which accounts for the disgraceful whining I hear about price gouging.

Indonesia is a member of OPEC, the cartel of oil-producing nations formed years ago to boost the price of oil. Since this nation of well over 150 million is also growing and they have energy demands as well, they are no longer exporting oil. They are using what they pump out of the ground for internal consumption. This means that soon Indonesia will no longer be an OPEC member.

And how about the British and the Norwegians and their North Sea oil? Production from that source is drastically down. It has dropped 10% in the last year. Don’t count on any new oil finds any time soon.

How about Mexico? It’s the same story here again. In 10 years, Mexico will also be importing oil – if there’s any to be had!

Alaska’s Prudhoe Bay production has long since declined from its peak years ago.

There hasn’t been any new, global, major oil discovery in years. And there’s not likely to be any new source any time soon. What sources are available domestically is bottled up due to foolish American energy policies – more on that in a minute.

But the really bad news comes from Saudi Arabia – long considered the “central bank” of oil in the world. It’s even worse than I thought.

First, Saudi Arabia made the unusually candid public admission that OPEC won’t be able to meet oil demands and needs within 10 to 15 years. And if this is the “official” public policy line, what is the real story? How really bad is it? Will it be shorter than 10 years? I suspect a yes answer.

How bad is it again? How about this? The Saudis recently hired 5 drilling rigs for underwater oil drilling. Those rigs are currently in the Gulf of Mexico under contract. Saudi Arabia had to have outbid somebody else to get them. This has happened at a time when oilrig rental rates are at rates 50% higher than a few years back – and going higher!

My question is this: if Saudi Arabia has such cheap oil so plentiful in the ground, why are they going to the trouble of drilling for far-more-expensive, offshore, underwater oil?

Could it be that maybe they just haven’t told us everything about how really short of oil supply that they are? If you answered anything but yes, you’d need your head examined.

And it explains something, for your information. Since the Saudis fund massive amounts of terrorism, it explains why they are desperately sending more cash to import terror into Iraq in the central front on the War Against Terror. They are running out of time because they are running out of oil. And soon the terrorists will have run out of cash to finance their war OF terror. This makes sense since it has the look of desperation.

Finally, there is a poor domestic oil and energy policy within the U.S.A.

Buried deep within the U.S. 1,724 page Energy Policy Act of 2005 is a provision to add to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Now at 700 million barrels of oil, the plan is to increase this to 1 billion barrels. Since we have two oilmen as President and Vice President in the administration, they certainly must know far more the public does about the true state of oil supply. Otherwise, why would you add to the SPR at prices now at $70 a barrel if there is no problem?

The situation is far more serious than we can imagine. And it means higher fuel prices.

Another bad energy policy decision is that of the shale oil in Colorado and nearby areas. Most of this oil source is on federally owned land.

Environmentalists have so far bottled up this potential energy source due to environmental concerns. Part of this may be justified, but how longer will they rule the day when gasoline prices come to hover around $6 a gallon? I’ll bet not much longer.

At a price of $38 per barrel, shale oil is economically viable. As technology comes on stream, this cost per barrel will drop lower, as did the Canadian tar sands technology that no extracts that oil at a cost of under $10 a barrel.

Yet environmentalists have also succeeded in preventing not only shale oil from being prospected for, but all offshore drilling in places off the Alaskan, Californian and Florida coasts. This is happening at a time when oil prices are skyrocketing. The politicians are listening to the wrong people, but I’ll wager not for much longer.

And what policy is being touted today? It’s conservation. It is not even a short-term solution. As heard on a national radio talk show, an auto executive remarked that even if all of America could be forced to drive hybrid vehicles, we’d be back at the same point we are today in just 6 years.

But there is a near-term solution to cheaper fuel prices. The trouble is that you’ll never hear the politicians advocate it. And why? It’s because it is too great a cash cow for the government coffers at both the federal and state levels.

It’s the excise taxes on a gallon of gas. If this were eliminated, the price of gasoline would drop by almost $1 a gallon at today’s high prices.

And how do I know this? The truth was revealed on one day 9 years back I lived in upstate New York.

At the time, the New York state government was trying to tax gasoline and tobacco on the Indian reservations – in direct violation of longstanding tax treaties that treat native American reservation land as sovereign territory.

I used to drive to the reservation to fill up with gasoline and the price difference was considerable. The difference was because the Indian reservation was exempt from federal and state excise taxes on gasoline, tobacco and other products.

The situation about taxing Native Americans drew some national attention and eventually, New York State was forced to back down in disgrace. But not before the local domestic gas dealerships had a demonstration of their own.

The gas station owners publicly displayed the actual price of a gallon of gas without both federal and state excise taxes. It was truly an eye-opener. Almost one third of the price of a gallon of gas is made up of these federal and state excise taxes.

While people are now blaming others for price gouging, they neglect the price gouging that their own governments have been doing to them for years and not a peep of protest was uttered.

I suspect that this public disclosure of what the feds and the states were taking in on a gallon of gas was the real reason that the State of New York backed down on its plans to tax the Indian reservations for its products available on the reservations.

After all, what did the federal or state government do to demand a higher “profit margin” on a gallon of gas than the oil companies and the gasoline dealerships? Nothing. They didn’t drill for oil, didn’t prospect for it, didn’t transport it or refine oil. Yet they have been gouging the consumer all these years in what can only be described as a shakedown of those so-called “greedy” oil companies.

And not only were they getting a bigger cut than the oil companies on a gallon of gas. In true busybody fashion, they were also telling them through environmental regulations in what proportions to blend gasoline and so on, further driving the cost of fuel up through compliance with standards that really didn’t need to be in place in the first place.

So, for all you disgraceful whiners out there, blame the right parties for your higher fuel prices where it belongs – your governments that are supposedly there for your interests and instead are in it for their own interests.

Governments today are only in it for the power, no matter which party happens to be in command. And furthermore, the decentralization process threatens their very existence as a big societal entity, and they will fight tooth and nail to exist in the form they are today.

Decentralization is acting to force all societal entities to become smaller. The last remaining bastion of bigness is in government. They are fiercely resisting this trend. It looks like they won’t go down without a fight. They will fight dirty when the time comes and to hell with any propaganda about how they’re needed. It’s going to get real ugly at some point in time in the future.

And of course, a scapegoat will HAVE to be found, because government will NEVER admit that they are the problem. More discussion on this will follow at a later date, but I can promise you that you are dreaming if you think government won’t step anybody’s toes just to exist – and those toes (or other bodily appendages) could well be – and will be yours. Make sure you squirrel away some gold far from the reaches of the desperate governments because the paper they call money will be worthless – as is the fate of all paper currency at all times in history.

But meanwhile …..

Expect to pay high prices for fuel for a long time to come.

And stop your whining.

Disengagement Dictator Ariel Sharon is in Trouble

2005-09-02T20:21:00.000-04:00

Disengagement from the Gaza Strip and Northern Shomron, even though a tactical success is still a failure – and it will cost Sharon his job as Prime Minister that he transformed into his own personal little dictatorship.

Disengagement is bound to fail either way whether it is successful in implementation or whether it might not have been successful.

I quote a very recent Reuters article below and add commentary as appropriate:

Sharon faces political fallout after quitting Gaza

By Jeffrey HellerWed Aug 24, 5:46 AM ET

Now that Jewish settlers have been pulled out of the occupied Gaza Strip, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon could face a "disengagement" of his own.

Sharon, branded a traitor by settlers he once championed and under fire from right-wingers who support them, looks increasingly like a man without a party as Israel gears up for elections due late next year.

An opinion poll published in the Haaretz daily on Wednesday, a day after Israel completed the evacuation of 9,000 settlers in the Gaza Strip and a corner of the West Bank under Sharon's "Disengagement Plan," showed him in deep political trouble.

No kidding there, mainstream media – last-to-get-it-media? If you in the mainstream media would pull your heads out of your rectums for just one second smell the real atmosphere, you’d find that the world doesn’t revolve your stupid leftist theology and unreal mindset that you’ve delusionally come to believe as social progress.

For one thing, if any of you had done your homework, Ariel Sharon was elected as PM for the Likud party because Israel’s public detests the land-for-peace propaganda that has been going on as a leftover legacy from the days when there used to be a superpower rivalry – but now there IS no Soviet Union to try to appease and not start a nuclear war.

Yes, you stupid leftists, your original Supreme God of your leftist theology is dead, and its successor god, the chief deity you call the UN (United Nations) is as rife with corruption, evil and incompetence as the Soviet Union was – and as any super-sized, McDonaldesque metaphor, government that you worship as a false god.

You’d know – if you did your homework – that Ariel Sharon promised to do just the exact opposite of what he delivered – not giving up any more territory, because the Oslo Accords were exposed as the sham they were.

But in the delusional Western mindset where two enemy states can live in harmony with each other and where everything is supposed to be groovy, it isn’t happening.

If you love those terrorist bastards, then why don’t you insist on taking them all into your own countries as an act of good faith to the Israelis – as refugees if you think Islam is such a religion of peace?

In a face-off for the leadership of their Likud party, Sharon's most powerful political rival, Benjamin Netanyahu, would take 47 percent of the vote to 30.5 percent for the prime minister if the contest were held now, the survey showed.

Netanyahu, who resigned as finance minister in what he called a protest against the evacuation of 21 settlements in Gaza and four in the West Bank, has been hammering home his view that Sharon has defrauded voters who elected him.

Yes, Netanyahu resigned, but so did an even greater Sharon Cabinet figure – former Soviet dissident Natan Sharansky – and well before the disengagement was almost upon Netanyahu before he opportunistically decided to state his opposition to disengagement.

The article doesn’t mention what the results would be if Sharanksy had been included as a preference of voters or poll respondents, but I’ll bet that the tally for Sharansky would be even larger than an almost 18% point lead.

By the way – you who are reading this – Netanyahu isn’t running in the Likud primaries due next month. Whoever wins those primaries automatically is the next Prime Minister of Israel. Netanyahu so far has not declared and isn’t on the ballot.

There are only 2 names on the ballot – Ariel Sharon and Rabbi Moshe Feiglin of Manhigut Yehudit – largest faction within the Likud party that Sharon tried so hard to get rid of, cajole, coax, threaten or absorb into a plush Cabinet job.

That deserves some consideration, because this shows that the Rabbi Feiglin is a man of principle and character – and it shows that the movement which he originally founded as “Zo Artzeinu” (This is our land), is a movement devoted to principled leadership.

The mainstream press, part of the delusional Left, will never say anything good about whom it considers a threat to their theology – in the same way that Pepsi will never have anything nice to say about Coca-Cola.

"Sharon's situation is bad -- very bad," wrote Haaretz political commentator Yossi Verter.

If even the leftist media in Israel can’t sugarcoat Sharon’s position any better than this, then it must truly be disastrous! Or else, one may say that the biased media is now in a position to be forced to be honest for a change and preserve its credibility. Conventional wisdom in Israel says much will depend on whether Palestinian militants in Gaza and the West Bank renew attacks they largely stopped some seven months ago -- violence which they said forced Sharon to retreat from occupied land.

Sharon has said he wanted to disengage from conflict with the Palestinians and quit areas he believes Israel has no chance of keeping in a future peace treaty.

"If quiet is maintained, Sharon will be the big winner, in every way," wrote Attila Somfalvi, political correspondent of the Israeli YNet news Web site. "Yet, if that doesn't happen, Sharon will be the one to pay the price."

Sharon also says Israel will keep much larger West Bank settlements, which Palestinians fear would strip them of land central to their goal of a viable state. Further West Bank settlement growth, Palestinians say, could reignite violence.

The entire premise of these paragraphs is wrong. There is no working moral philosophy except that of the left of land-for-peace, and not winning the public relations war that Israel is truly the real native population and exposing the Arab claim as a fraud.

But that is just part of the answer. Jews indeed have a greater destiny on this Earth as the Chosen Ones of the Supreme Deity – one whom can be easily and scientifically demonstrated to exist, and of whom I already proved exists by merely proving the impossibility of evolution through statistical analysis and common sense – in an article on this same blog called “Evolution is Wrong.” Consult the archives for further information on this topic.

Israel has no chance of keeping certain lands? WHAT? Is America going to bomb Israel with nukes and out of oblivion? Is that what’s going to happen? Not likely.

So what will happen if Israel refuses to go along with the Bush Road Map and proves its point about land-for-peace being a failure and exposes the falsity of the Oslo Accord cultists? The big bad American wolf will huff and puff and go away when more Western targets who were sympathetic to Islam get bombed by the terrorists who observe the so-called religion of peace!

WHAT quiet? Abbas has already gone on record as saying that the Gaza Strip will become a base of operations a terror state to “liberate Palestine”, and never ever was there a revocation of Article 15 of the PLO Charter which reads as follows:

The Liberation of Palestine, from an Arab viewpoint, is a national (qawmi) duty and it attempts to repel the Zionist and imperialist aggression against the Arab homeland, and aims at the liquidation of the Zionist presence in Palestine.

That article above still stands uncontested and the wishes for a two-state solution and a groovy peace rests with Mahmoud Abbas, successor to Yasser Arafat, who stood by his side for decades as a willing accomplice in terror.

And promised hundreds of millions of money in foreign aid without having to sign one piece of paper for peace! Hitler had at least to sign a piece of paper with British PM Neville Chamberlain to be able to do his dirty work.

At a weekly "ranch forum" of advisers at Sharon's homestead in southern Israel, opinion has split over whether he should do battle in the Likud or create a new party for the election, said a political source familiar with the deliberations.

Another option -- retirement -- is not currently on the cards, a Sharon confidant said, adding: "But that could change if polls get worse and a wave of terror erupts."

Sharon, 77, has pledged publicly to seek a third term as prime minister. But the political source said Sharon has yet to decide whether to try to do so on the Likud ticket.

No date has been set for a party primary election. Past bids by Israeli leaders to vie for votes in breakaway factions, most famously in 1965 by founding father David Ben-Gurion, have been largely unsuccessful.

His political future clouded at home, Sharon plans an outing next month to the U.N. General Assembly where accolades from world leaders over the pullout could give him a domestic boost.

Government officials said Sharon was trying to arrange meetings at the United Nations with Arab leaders following Israel's first scrapping of settlements from occupied land Palestinians want for a state.

"Sharon hopes the U.N. will bolster him," a political source said about an organization Israel has long regarded as hostile.

The last sentence tells you all you need to know. The UN as an organization has indeed been hostile to Israel. 3rd World crackpot dictators who would love to see an Israel to blame to deflect attention away from their own domestic political failures have dominated it. Sharon’s appeal will be seen as a further betrayal of Israel by its “believing” public (the majority) and the tin pot, 3^rd-World dictators will find a way to screw Sharon over some way and reflect their true anti-Semitic hatred.

Side note: Rabbi Moshe Feiglin – the only other declared candidate for the leadership of the Likud primaries and then the next Israeli Prime Minister - stated that the rightist parties get elected because of the no-territory compromise, but they ultimately fail because they have no driving belief and fall into the foolishness of the Left.

How true have we seen this happen! Disengagement may have been tactically successful, but it will backfire upon Ariel Sharon. If it doesn’t do so, Israel’s actual long-term existence is in question.

In the meantime, it's been gloves-off on the always-heated Israeli political scene.

"We won't touch you physically, but we will send you in disgrace to the political Muqata of (your) ranch," ultra nationalist legislator Effi Eitam told Sharon at a recent parliamentary committee meeting.

The Muqata was the compound in the Israeli-surrounded West Bank city of Ramallah where Sharon kept the late Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat penned in almost 3 years.

The ultra nationalist was being kind. Far greater disgrace awaits Ariel Sharon should he lose the Likud primaries. And lose them he should, and must – if Israel is to survive.

The legacy of “Land-for-Peace” has been a failure ever since it was implemented because it was based on false premises that Arabs had a right to live there based on an ancient homeland – which has been proven NEVER to have ever existed. And this proof is not hard to find if you have the courage to look for truth. Many times I found all the proof I needed on the first page, if not the first result of my Google search.

Since when does the world demand of a conquering nation who acted in self-defense in 1967 to return lands to the aggressor nations who started the trouble in the first place, and back then – and still now – demand the destruction of the same nation that acted in self-defense? What is up with that?

Exactly what kind of message do you send to the guys that were the troublemakers in the first place?

I’ll tell you if you are a leftist moron reading this: that terror pays.

What Does Tisha B'Av Mean to Me?

2005-08-14T20:36:00.000-04:00

What does Tisha B’Av – the Jewish holiday that commemorates the anniversaries destruction of the first and second Temples to God in Jerusalem – mean to me?

The oral tradition says that the Temple was so far in disrepair that it deserved to be destroyed because the Chosen Ones of the Almighty neglected its upkeep and forgot what it all meant to have one there in the first place.

The oral tradition is correct.

Since the Chosen Ones are still forgetful – but are making greater strides in remembering why – it is the reason that a new Temple is still not there today.

And in this anniversary – today in 2005 it is mourned upon August 13 – now we have the specter of an illegal expulsion of Jews from settlements that these rightful natives have made in the Gaza Strip and in 4 settlements in Northern Shomron. This dictatorial action by Ariel Sharon comes in the wake of Tisha B’Av – the day that the loss of the great Temples is being mourned.

How ironic this is. This is what it means to me.

And yet more.

This is called “disengagement” – yet it should be called by its rightful name: expulsion.

Here we have an example of the first time of the history of a democratic nation where some of its citizens are being forcefully expelled from land that they have legitimately bought on the open market, made the desert bloom and now are forced to abandon to a government of thugs who will return the land back into a desert.

This is supposedly done in the name of “peace” – with another dictator of the PLO who has never called revoked Article 15 of the PLO Charter and never called to account for it and still promised hundreds of millions of dollars in foreign aid.

Israel is giving up this small piece of territory with nothing to show for it in return. The Arab terrorists are celebrating in the streets and passing out candies to the children and they are learning that terror pays.

All the while, terror in Britain is now being dealt with swiftly there as in the days after 9/11/2001 in the United States.

But no! Israel cannot defend itself the same way, yet has the equivalent of a London subway bombing every week or a 9/11 almost every week.

Is a Jewish life worth less than a Gentile one?

Despite the fact that terrorists cannot be trusted, British PM Tony Blair figures he can crack down on the terror in his own backyard, but he still insists on a 2-state solution elsewhere – as does President George W Bush.

I guess terror is OK in Israel, but not in THEIR back yard because you see, all Jews are degenerate pigs because they didn’t accept Jesus Christ into their lives as fulfillment of prophecy, so they must die.

THIS is what Tisha B’Av means to me.

Never mind that Christians STOLE all their moral ideas from Jews.

Never mind that when Jews started to do what the early Christians did and started to preach and proselytize for new believers – the Christians demanded that they stop it!

DO as I say, not as I do, I guess. That is also what Tisha B’Av means to me.

I have more thoughts for the stupid among you – and there are plenty enough of you thoughtless robots who follow a programmed script of “modern societal thinking” and are afraid to think for themselves and examine all things for truth.

You are afraid because you care more to be popular and have people like you than to do the right thing. Beware such a “path of least resistance” because not only does it show that you are gutless cowards, but that there are few people among you have any real leadership potential.

Leadership doesn’t come from following the status quo and the fashionable thoughts of the times. It requires real thought and a willingness to expect hatred, laughter and the spite from those among the established order that have the most to lose from real reform.

Thomas Jefferson said once: “one man with courage is a majority”.

That is also what Tisha B’Av means to me.

One man with courage is a majority because ideas are very powerful – indeed so powerful that a ruling order has to use whatever means at its disposal to silence all those who dissent. If what the establishment believes is so correct, they wouldn’t be forcing legitimate settlers from their homes in a democracy where it shouldn’t be happening in the first place – and certainly not in the only nation in the Middle East that nominally practices democracy.

This also I have learned today from this day of mourning – Tisha B’Av.

And the great idea that threatens the establishment within modern Israel today is that they don’t like the settlements and would rather give them to the enemy and rule over a pile of dust, become “museum Jews” with Indian reservations as is currently the state of the native Americans within America.

I have heard that the Leftists want a pile of rubble to rule. Disengagement will make that pile into a reality. But I think that the Almighty wants something different.

For the Gentiles are still so guilty about the Holocaust, but still anti-Semitic, that they can’t dare rebuild the concentration camps and gas chambers to finish the job.

They want the Jews to finish the job themselves – by committing a slow suicide called the peace process – which is the biggest diplomatic fraud that ever existed.

If Jews self-destruct, then the Gentiles won’t be forced to make excuses to rebuild the concentration camps and gas chambers that Hitler started and they wouldn’t be forced to complete. That would put them in an awful bind.

You see, O Israel, the Gentiles are very touchy about the subject of genocide.

The Gentiles are so touchy about genocide that they will invent all manner of language to try to dissuade you from listening to my words of truth that they can’t touch!

In fact, I’ll tell you right now that they will call me an extremist to try to discredit me – if ever I get the opportunity to really persuade you that what I say is true – AND IT IS!

They will bemoan thusly: “How can desecrate the memory of the Holocaust so casually with your words?” The translation that you, O Israel, should be concerned about is this:

“How can you, the author of this blog, dare to remind us so blatantly of our moral responsibility when our hands were caught so far down inside the cookie jars as children that our guilt was never in question?”

This is also what Tisha B’Av means to me – whose grandfather was a Jew in Hitler’s Germany – and whose name I honor today even though I never met him personally. He had to change his last name so he wouldn’t go to the concentration camps like his fellow Jews and he had to change his last name to a more “German-sounding” surname.

And you know what? When I bring up the subject of the holocaust – especially to the libertarians – they complain about me accusing them of anti-Semitism. Well, yes it is! And what’s YOUR point? That it’s not?

I have declared and demanded proudly about where in history was there ever ANY “Palestinian State”, when was it established, who was its first king and where was its capital – and these same idiotic libertarians can’t come up with an answer!

Want to know why? It’s because there is none! The Palestinian State that they like to espouse a 2-state solution NEVER existed except in the propaganda of the Arabs.

The Libertarian idiots decry the influence of religion just as much as the Leftist morons who are rapidly becoming obsolete. Yet what has the man-made peace process brought so far to the Middle East? Nothing but war!

I have already explained clearly why there IS a Supreme Entity of the Universe and shown how Evolution as it stands is a total falsehood. Libertarians place too much faith in the ability of mankind. Well? Where is the peace? You’ve had since 1948 to have it.

And what would Islam do with libertarians, leftists and liberals if they ever came to dominate the world? They would all die – horribly because they too are unbelievers!

This I have learned before but got reminded of today on 9 Av – Tisha B’Av.

Today we have a fluke of history that is being corrected out of existence – but not without resistance from those who still believe the falsehoods as truth and know no other way throughout history – because they mistakenly believe that what they do is called in the modern times as “progress”.

Some progress this is!

The western society of today has a +50% divorce rate, children without fathers and mothers forced to fend for themselves. And the statistics tell us that children without a father have emotional, relational and other problems. They become society’s problems – and all to the heartbreak of their mothers who did the best they could!

I recently met a woman who had a divorce and is incarcerated. I don’t know her whole story – but I don’t need to. Perhaps some of it is her fault but society also has more than its share of blame.

What happens when an individual does something wrong? He or she pays a price.

But what happens when the society that this individual depends upon a society who has promised a framework for success, then reneges on its rules and changes them in midstream, leaving that individual holding the bag?

Nothing!

The individual is still to blame, has to “get over it”, and somehow survive and prosper. But that collective entity known as society in the modern world somehow escapes blame.

That is the nature of “society”: it’s a collection of individuals who get together and evade and diffuse blame and responsibility for its mistakes and social experimentation and it’s NEVER THEIR FAULT!

The individual to whom I write this – I will not name her – but I want her to show this to her evil oppressors and demand that they also accept their share of blame for the situation that she finds herself in.

Now tell me: is calling a collection of individuals who would have to face severe consequences for actions that they did as individuals, wrong, that they can avoid by calling themselves a “society” – and is this not “EVIL”?

That is the main problem in America today.

It has lost its moral base and all the people who have depended upon that moral base of action from the society that abandoned it are left high and dry to fend for themselves.

This is also what I have learned from this day where I have fasted in concern for my brothers and sisters in Gush Katif – no however imperfect that I kept the observance of Tisha B’Av today. I will get better once I get really serious about Orthodox Jewish conversion – and I believe that this will happen sooner than I think.

There are many more things that I have opportunity to learn while my stomach grumbled about how much was not getting there. But that will have to wait until next year.

This blog article I write especially to you, “C” – you know who you are – and I am writing this just for you because you have given me a special meaning to this day of mourning for me – Tisha B’Av – the date of the destruction of God’s Holy Temples in Jerusalem – and I know now that there is a purpose for my life here in America before I depart to the Holy Land.

My thoughts and prayers go out to you, and to my oppressed brothers and sisters in the faraway land – Israel – that one day I must go to.

I hope that you too remember me..

This is all that I can say for now what Tisha B’Av means to me.

7/7/2005: You Got What You Deserved

2005-07-28T13:19:00.000-04:00

Are you going to wake up now?

The London bombings should be your wake-up call.

I am talking of the idiotic Left, the indifferent masses and uninformed out there who still believe that there should be a two-state Palestine solution and that Islam is a religion of peace.

The Left will not change its mind because they have too much invested in their lies that they have to keep repeating the lies they’ve already told. They’ve dug a hole so deep that credibility issues will destroy them now no matter what.

The uninformed and indifferent are a different story. When a British radio show interviewed the brother of one of the subway train bombers of 7/7/2005, the Pakistani guy spoke with a clear Yorkshire accent. So does his brother the terrorist. These bombers were 2^nd-generation Pakistanis who embraced Islamofascism. Of course, Britons were in a state of shock.

Why how could anybody embrace such a terrorist ideology, having grown up in a civilized and tolerant society such as what the West has? Westerners everywhere are asking that question as if in a state of disbelief, and I think there will be some defense mechanism that arises from the woodwork to somehow blame Israel and British support for the War on Terror currently being conducted at the central front in Iraq.

I’ll tell you how someone could embrace such an ideology of terror – because western society today is in a state of relative decline and isn’t a proselytizing influence. Its morality has been corrupted and morality in general has assumed too many gray areas.

Liberalism has disconnected punishment from crime in the name of compassion. It has also disconnected right from wrong, good from evil and turned the entire morality upon its head – totally backwards from where it ought to be.

When wishful thinkers insist upon a two-state solution in Israel where there never was ever a Palestinian state, you are rewarding falsehood and this is the price you pay for embracing Islam. When you give credence to lies, the perpetrators will be back for more – just like the schoolyard bully who won’t be satisfied with shaking down only one defenseless kid for his lunch money. He will be emboldened and empowered to keep doing it and being more outrageous each time – until somebody stands up to the bully.

And when you demand zero concessions from the Arabs for a promise of peace and all the while make all sorts of demands from the real natives of the Holy Land – the Jews – how do you expect the terrorists to act? That they are losing? And that they are being promised hundreds of billions because of Mahmoud Abbas and the promise of peace, when his acts of the past show no such inclination?

Remember Madrid and the 192 dead in the train bombs and the fraidy-cat election of the leftist candidate days later who announced the Spanish troops’ pullout from Iraq.

What exactly did you in the West teach the terrorists by that? You taught them terror pays. You will now get more – not less – terror. And the terror that ensues will be even bolder than before. You have given them moral sanctuary for their ideology that it never deserved in the first place.

And what about George “sorry-ass” Soros, the billionaire Jew who sinks millions of dollars into interfering with the elections of countries about the world, trying to influence the outcome? The Arab propagandists of Islamofascism claim that a worldwide cabal of Jews are controlling the whole world. Isn’t what Soros is doing only reinforcing this false stereotype and giving credence to the Arabist propaganda? Just how likely will it be that terror will not happen in retribution for what Soros is doing? What signal is he sending for his irresponsible behavior – entirely for the purpose of enriching himself?

Exactly what signal is London’s mayor Ken Livingstone sending when he embraces a terrorist-style Islam imam who calls for Islam to dominate the world, trashes Israel and the Mayor of London embraces him publicly? The terrorists now believe even more strongly that they are in the right.

When the Leftists openly are hostile to the legitimate war on terror toi the point of giving aid and comfort to the enemy, how does this NOT empower the foreign terrorists that are fighting in Iraq?

And what signal is being given when you call these thugs only “insurgents” and the killers that they truly are? Do the leftists think Arabs can’t read and consult a dictionary and see that they have just had legitimacy endorsed for their activities?

When the Left cheers and worships dictators around the world, what signal does that send to the terrorists? Is not the left being used as useful idiots? They certainly are.

So why should anybody be surprised when the terror strikes close to home?

Why is it suddenly a big deal when Gentile innocent civilians get murdered when it happens in Israel to Jews almost every week? Is a Jew’s life less valuable than a Gentile life? It is any wonder why any believing Jew thinks that the West is anti-Semitic? Do not the actions of the West enable more anti-Semitism?

What do you think the terrorists are thinking when Jewish settlers are going to be forced in an unlawful expulsion from the Gaza Strip and Northern Shomron? This proposed act of forced expulsion has never happened in a democratic nation. Yet that is exactly what is being proposed. Will the terrorists consider this a defeat or a victory for them? I’ve basically answered the question for you already. For you to make something else out of it must mean that you are trying hard to make a fool of yourself more than you already are.

It’s funny if it weren’t so serious how the Left embraces Islam the religion instead of Christianity or Judaism. Islam is the strictest religion in the world and would destroy the liberals once they had no further use for them. Yet apparently, liberals and the leftists would rather fight the devils they know than the devils they don’t. Somehow, they cling preciously to the delusion that somehow, the Left is “above the fray” and that there is somewhere a moderate Arab Messiah to prove them right.

The Left has chosen self-delusion over facing the fraud of their claims. Does the Left think that the Arabs and other Islamofascists don’t see this either?

The PLO has never been called on the carpet for retaining Article 15 of their Charter calling for the “liquidation of the Zionist presence” by any means possible. Just how does this promote the peace process? In fact, this makes the peace process a fraud that has been ongoing for the last 43 years – since 1967. Does the Western world think that the thug terrorists don’t notice this little detail?

And this fraud cannot last, now that truth is finally coming to the forefront. The days when lies exist, thrive and build themselves a throne – are over.

Does the West think that being terrorists called “insurgents”, isn’t going to get noticed by the terrorist thugs either?

What happened in London on 7/7/2005 destroyed the wishful thinking of peace and harmony with Islam. Yet foolishly, many people of the West will look to place blame upon Israel and Jews for what happened. My, oh my, those subhuman Jews seem to cause so much trouble for the world.

What defense mechanism will the Gentile world try to employ to avoid the awful truth that has been exposed? No matter what it will be, there will be even more outrageous acts of terror that will happen to force the West to deal with terror once and for all or else look totally ridiculous trying to make excuses.

Reviewing all that I’ve cited above, isn’t it more correct to assume that London got what it deserved on 7/7/2005, just for cheering for the bully?

How many more times will people get kicked in the head by Big Terror before they wake up and address the real problem of terror – that Islam wants to dominate the world?

Like the old oil filter commercial says: “You can pay me now, or you can pay me later”.

Global Warming is NOT Man-Made

2005-07-05T18:46:00.000-04:00

Back on or about April 2002, I made an open challenge to anybody to supply proof that there is any substance to any environmentalist wacko scare story about the environment.

My challenge is simply this:

Show me the undisputed study on any environmental catastrophe, the year it was published, who did the research and in what institution this proof was conducted.

So far, I have had NO TAKERS!

Why? It’s because there is no proof that there has ever been global warming because of man-made activity, no acid rain caused because of man-made activity, no greenhouse effect, no ozone depletion because of man-made activity – and no man-made activity has ever been responsible for any environmental crisis – if ever there were such a crisis.

I now give you my commentary on the stupidity below that passes for news. You really need to go through such stories with a fine-toothed comb to analyze the real truth because the mainstream liberal press only sees what it wants to see.

Global Warming Makes Sea Less Salty

Michael Schirber
LiveScience Staff Writer
LiveScience.com Wed Jun 29, 2:00 PM ET

You won't want to drink water straight from the ocean anytime soon. But the salt content is on the decline, a sign of potentially worrisome consequences that scientists can't accurately predict.

Since the late 1960s, much of the North Atlantic Ocean has become less salty, in part due to increases in fresh water runoff induced by global warming, scientists say. Now for the first time researchers have quantified this fresh water influx, allowing them to predict the long-term effects on a "conveyor belt" of ocean currents.

Climate changes in the Northern Hemisphere have melted glaciers and brought more rain, dumping more fresh water into the oceans, according to the analysis.

The writing is certainly cleverly worded to make the average, intellectually lazy person reading this article to infer that the cause for climate change is man-made. That is the danger presented by such articles – they are worded in such a way as to imply that global warming is man-made. Yet little or no consideration has been given to the possibility that climactic change is due to natural processes that have nothing to do with mankind. In fact, it is true that we are in an interglacial period.

Before we start sinking money into a problem, we’d best make sure that there is a problem that needs fixing. I highly doubt it. Mankind couldn’t create enough pollutants to raise the level of greenhouse gases to cause a global warming.

And in any case, such activity would cause the exponential growth of trees and their related forests, thus taking out carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and locking it into the carbon that makes up timber. This is a self-correcting mechanism.

The sea itself is also a remarkable cleansing agent, also soaking up excess carbon dioxide. So there really isn’t anything to worry about.

What's going on

Curry and Cecilie Mauritzen of the Norwegian Meteorological Institute calculated that an extra 19,000 cubic kilometers of water flowed into and diluted the northern seas between 1965 and 1995.

For comparison, the Mississippi River releases about 500 cubic kilometers of freshwater into the Gulf of Mexico each year, while the Amazon, the Earth's largest river, discharges roughly 5,000 cubic kilometers annually.

Because water with lower salinity is less dense, adding fresh water may affect ocean flows like the conveyor belt – a system of Atlantic currents that exchanges cold water in the Arctic region for warm water from the tropics.

The top part of this conveyor is made of warm ocean currents, like the Gulf Stream, flowing northward along the surface. At high latitudes, this water cools and sinks – releasing its heat to the atmosphere and making for moderate winter climates in places like England.

Deep, cold currents return some of the water to the south.

Slight changes in the currents -- both seasonal and longer-term variations -- affect everything from hurricane formation to droughts and heat waves.

Future uncertain

No significant change in the conveyor belt has yet been observed, however. Curry and Mauritzen estimate that it would take another century to slow the ocean exchanges if the current rate of fresh water inflow continues.

Oh, now the writer takes it all back, sort of.

Scientists disagree over whether the planet is warming and how much humans might be contributing. But most climate experts see a clear warming trend that they expect will continue for at least a century.

Then what is the point of this article is there is no consensus? The writer claims that most climate experts see a warming trend, but he offers no proof that this is the case. If there is no consensus, there is no conclusive proof.

"Given the projected 21st Century rise in greenhouse gas concentrations and increased fresh water input to the high-latitude ocean, we cannot rule out a significant slowing of the Atlantic conveyor in the next 100 years," Curry said.

She emphasized, however, that effects will be gradual. "We are not suggesting that the Gulf Stream will shut down," she said.

A study last year concluded that an altered conveyor belt could actually plunge the planet into a global cooling event.

The new research was published in the June 17 issue of the journal Science.

This is another neat trick that a writer who wants to bias you into believing his line does: the truth is buried toward the end of the article, hoping that you don’t read to the end, thus hoping to plant a seed of doubt in your mind the next time the subject of any environmental crisis or disaster comes up – same treatment, same spin, same tactics.

Note also how the possibility that this climactic change could be a natural phenomenon wasn’t even brought up for consideration. The writer preferred to set up a straw man argument – another favorite tactic by those who want to influence the ignorant and lazy.

And now, a related story regarding the Kyoto Protocols – one of the biggest frauds ever perpetrated by anti-capitalist, environmentalists upon the world:

Kyoto protocol: waste of cash or green lifeline?

By Alister Doyle, Environment Correspondent Thu Jun 30, 9:02 AM ET

A waste of more than $1,300 a year for every American, undermining economic growth and jobs? Or a lifeline for the planet costing just an annual $20 for each European?

The U.N.'s Kyoto protocol on curbing global warming looks utterly different when viewed from Washington, which opposes the 150-nation pact, or from its main backers in the European Union, Japan or Canada.

The United States says the EU got off lightly in its targets for cutting use of fossil fuels and shifting to cleaner energies such as solar and wind power under Kyoto.

"The reductions (in greenhouse gases) the EU have to make were modest compared to what might be required by the United States," said U.S. Senior Climate Negotiator Harlan Watson.

Supporters of Kyoto, which entered into force on Feb. 16, see it as a tiny first step to avert what could be far higher costs of more storms, droughts, heat waves and rising sea levels that could drive thousands of species to extinction by 2100.

The last sentence is pure speculation. Who says so? What proof is there? What proof was ever offered in this article or elsewhere? None. If one had to offer proof, that would get in the way of a good story!

The EU Commission reckons Kyoto will cut the EU's annual gross domestic product (GDP) by 0.06 percent by 2010 when it has full effect, Runge-Metzger said. That would work out roughly at $20 for each EU citizen in 2010 alone.

"We think this is affordable, in fact it disappears in the noise of the statistics," Runge-Metzger said. Japan and Canada also see costs as manageable.

In the past, U.S. officials have estimated Kyoto could mean a brake in U.S. economic output of up to $400 billion by 2010 in the worst case, or 4.2 percent of GDP. That would mean more than $1,300 for each American that year.

Bush pulled the United States, the world's biggest polluter, out of Kyoto in 2001, branding it too costly and unfair because it omits developing nations from a first round of cuts until 2012.

The problem with this article is that it puts things in terms of economics instead of dealing with any possibility that greenhouse gas emissions have no scientific basis in fact as causing any global warming.

Also, the fact that China and India – both rapidly industrializing nations with millions of laborers ready to build ever more factories and adding more pollution – makes the entire Kyoto Protocol Treaty unenforceable even if it could be proven that such pollution leads to any climactic change. So why bother tying the developed world’s hands while leaving the developing world’s hands unfettered? That was why the U.S. Senate rejected the Kyoto treaty 98-0 in the first place, and they show no signs of changing their vote.

In Summary:

The fact that there is a lively debate over whether there is a global warming and whether man has any responsibility in it has been ignored by a mainstream liberal news media willing to aid and abet a cause where no problem even exists.

So my challenge still stands for any liberal idiot who wishes to take it up:

SHOW ME THE STUDY – THAT CONCLUSIVELY PROVES BEYOND DOUBT THAT ANY ENVIRONMENTAL CRISIS EXISTS AND THAT IT IS PROVEN BEYOND DOUBT THAT MANKIND IS THE CULPRIT, NAME ME THE YEAR OF THE STUDY AND RESEARCH, THE INSTITUTION THAT CONDUCTED THE RESEARCH, WHO HEADED THE STUDY AND WHAT HIS OR HER CREDENTIALS ARE FOR MAKING THE CLAIM, AND SHOW IT FOR ANY OF THE ENVIRONMENTALIST SCARE STORIES, BE IT ACID RAIN, OZONE LAYER DEPLETION OR GLOBAL WARMING.

Go ahead – make my day. I will spare you the trouble – because no such studies exist.

More on the Upcoming Big News Story of 2005

2005-06-28T00:30:00.000-04:00

This is further commentary on the impending news story of 2005, projected to begin about the late summer, and it concerns the Gaza Strip disengagement – and why this expulsion of Jews from settlements will be a colossal failure.

Rice Urges Cooperation on Gaza Withdrawal

By ANNE GEARAN, AP Diplomatic Writer

U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice met on Saturday with Palestinians leaders after saying they must plan together with Israeli officials for this summer's withdrawal of Jewish settlers from the Gaza Strip.

"There needs to be clarity about what to expect," Rice told reporters Friday, en route to Jerusalem. "That, I think, will lead to less confusion on what is likely to be, under the best of circumstances, a pretty complicated day."

Both sides are afraid that without coordination, militants and looters would fill the vacuum Israel leaves behind after 38 years.

What? Even WITH coordination, the militants and looters will have free run of the Gaza Strip, as Mahmoud Abbas made clear to his Syrian President host at a recent meeting in Damascus that he intends for the Gaza Strip to be a major base of terror operations. The entire Middle East U.S. policy, as it pertains to Israel is based on wishful thinking that will certainly disappoint, to say it mildly and charitably. All the concessions and good will exist on only the Israeli side, and nothing is being demanded of the Arabs in return.

Rice was holding talks Saturday with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and members of the Cabinet, including Prime Minister Ahmed Qureia, Foreign Minister Nasser Al-Kidwa and Interior Minister Nasser Yousef.

"I'm certainly going to talk with President Abbas about the need ... for the Palestinians to play a critical role in providing a secure environment in which the Gaza disengagement can take place," Rice said during her trip from Washington.

"Obviously, that means that the calm that he has discussed with the various Palestinian factions is going to have to hold," she said, adding that he must be tough with the militant group Hamas.

The relative “calm” that is apparent is only because there in the Middle East, diplomacy is merely another approach to warfare. While this “calm” is in effect, the terrorist forces are rearming through smuggling of heavy weapons and the like while Egypt endorses and cooperates with the Palestinian thugs. If the Gaza disengagement is successful, no city on Israel will likely be safe from terror attack and artillery fire.

In southern Gaza on Saturday, Palestinian militants attacked a settlement, leading to a gun fight that killed one of the attackers and wounded a second, the army said. No soldiers or residents were injured.

Let’s look at this not as an isolated incident, but as a sign that the terrorists believe that the disengagement plan is a victory for them, and they are eager and empowered by what they consider the weakening will of the “Zionist enemy” – and not have to do anything to grab more land that was never theirs to have in the first place.

Rice planned to meet on Sunday with Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in Jerusalem. It was part of her weeklong trip to the Middle East and Europe.

Israel's planned August withdrawal from all 21 Jewish settlements on Gaza and four of the 120 in the West Bank is a major benchmark of progress toward an eventual peace deal.

"What they are doing is moving thousands of people with their effects, and families, and it's going to be complicated," Rice said before the talks with the Palestinian leaders.

Let’s see if you the reader make sense of this:

Thousands of law-abiding citizens in a democracy are being expelled to appease millions of non-democratic people for the sake of peace. These citizens within the Gaza Strip and Northern Shomron bought their land for settlement with their own money at fair market value, transformed the desert into a bountiful agricultural oasis that accounts for 11% of all Israeli agricultural exports.

Furthermore, we are witnessing the forced expulsion of citizens of a democracy! This has never happened within any democracy! How is this supposed to help the cause of peace? What signal does it send to the enemy? He is laughing his head off because the naïve, idealists are giving them credit for goodwill that these So-called moderates never deserved in the first place and have had to make zero concessions.

This peace deal is a surrender and Jewish blood will be spilled to make the point.

The U.S. is taking a mostly hands-off approach to the peace process.

This is a “hands-off approach to the peace process”? Are you kidding me? The U.S. is leading it, has got its nose deep into the anal cavity of this stinking sellout. But soon the defecation will begin, and somebody is going to come out smelling bad.

Rice warned Israel not to complicate the path to peace through new Jewish settlements just as the Gaza pullout date nears.

"We don't intend that the Israelis try to create facts on the ground," Rice said during the flight from Washington. "They simply cannot engage in activities that are supposed to prejudge," the final terms of a peace settlement.

Palestinians charge that Israel has tried to force territorial concessions by building settlements and outposts on land that would presumably one day belong to a separate Palestinian homeland. The two sides are arguing now over whether Israel will build more than 3,000 new homes near Jerusalem.

The U.S. long has supported the idea of two democratic states for Israelis and Palestinians. But it has not always been clear about the details. Recently, however, the Bush administration has made the no-new-settlements issue very plain.

Look very carefully and scrutinize the entire tone and theme of this last quote from the news article.

It is making clear that Jews are the foreign invaders and occupiers, when in fact the Jews are the natives to this land and the Arabs are squatters and illegal residents. America is doing to Israel what they did to the North American Indians – taking their land away from them. Only this time, they’re not taking it for themselves but surrendering it to thugs, murderers, bullies and beast donning the cloak of respectability.

With Abbas at his side at a White House meeting last month, President Bush made clear his support for a Palestinian state within the rough outlines of the current West Bank and Gaza territories.

He warned Israel not to complicate matters through settlements or other actions that make it physically difficult to construct viable Palestinian borders.

Again, here we have a clear-cut case that Jews are regarded not as the legitimate natives of their own land, but that Arabs are – fact #1 is true and proven throughout history and fact #2 isn’t.

International concern about the Gaza plans centers on whether Israeli settlers will put up a fight and whether militants opposed to peace might try to disrupt the departure with violence.

Two points to make here:

One – international concern is only about dead Jews than living ones and the other nations of the West are more concerned about their oil supply than the safety of Israel.

Two – and this will not be reported until after the fact when the disengagement plan collapses on its face. The settlers aren’t making plans to leave. They are in fact right now planting their crops in full anticipation of staying right there in the Gaza Strip as if nothing is going to happen! Doesn’t that seem strange, idiotic or crazy to you?

Why would they be planting crops just as the Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon is selling out their land to the enemy? Could it be that they know something that the rest of the world knows?

I think so. The Israeli public is on the side of the settlers and the issue has not been put to a referendum vote by Sharon. And for good reason – he knows he will lose.

In addition, there is the question of whether the Palestinians can sustain a working government and keep a lid on violence once the Israelis leave.

Rice gave a cautious endorsement of Palestinian progress to organize and train an effective security force.

"In terms of the Palestinians' apparent determination to streamline their security forces into a manageable number of forces that can then be trained and act professionally, I think they are making progress on that," she said.

"In terms of their ability to fight terror and what they do on a day-to-day basis, frankly I do think more could be done," she said.

The Arab thugs have no intention of keeping a lid on violence. In fact, known killers and terrorist are being integrated into the Palestinian forces with the full knowledge and cooperation of Abu Mazen – in a process known as “streamlining”. It is these recruits that are expected to “keep a lid on violence”. Talk about the fox guarding the henhouse!

Even the Arabs working under Israeli farms and factories there prefer the Jews to the PLO thugs. They vent privately for fear of being retaliated against by the PLO. These Arabs will either have no jobs to go to once disengagement takes place, or their jobs will go to PLO cronies in a thug patronage system.

But good news is coming. The world will be in shock when massive demonstrations throughout Israeli city streets take place, taking up all the police and army manpower to restrain possible violence, when massive amounts of policemen and army personnel refuse to obey the disengagement plan of Dictator Sharon.

What the general public isn’t aware of is that even a dictator doesn’t have enough personnel of his own to force his unpopular polices against an unwilling public. If enough people take to the streets, there will be no way the disengagement takes place. The settlers will refuse to leave and the army will stop and say that this is a political matter.

And then in September when the Likud leadership convention takes place, Ariel Sharon will be dismissed with the massive failure of the Gaza Strip disengagement staring him in the face.

The Way The World Really Works

2005-06-24T07:31:00.000-04:00

Pardon me in advance for being abrasive, blunt and brutal in my assessment of the way the world really is and where it will go in the near future, but I have no choice.

If any of you ever hope to learn reality, your paradigms, belief systems, religions and ideologies will be challenged here today. You will need to have the courage to fact the truth about your worldviews.

The reason you need courage to abandon your worldview is that you face pressures to conform to present thinking that predominates the “modern” and “postmodern” society, or whatever they call themselves today – and these present-day intellectuals are NOT “enlightened” as they would try to have you believe. You’d best abandon the current mode of thinking of these times if you are ever to achieve true knowledge.

As a result, I expect a lot of hate email from this article from the mental midgets who will curiously troll this web site and find something very offensive to their cherished little world of delusional security.

Furthermore, I issue a challenge to anybody who can refute my views, because I think NOBODY can. Spare me any ad hominem attacks because your pathetic tirades will indicate that you lack any measurable intelligence.

This is a standing offer to anybody: I challenge anyone to refute my views on how the world really works and operates. I expect no takers, and I will keep a running tab on who did accept the offer, and how many really did make a bona fide attempt at trying to discredit me, and publish the results here in the blog.

As things presently stand, the political Left is disintegrating. The accumulated facts and data from that past century has proven that leftism is a fraud that only achieved any stature at all because of the existence of Big Government. The rationalization for its very existence was invented. Even today around the world, countries that formerly embraced communism and socialism are rejecting it outright.

The Leftists are crying and are depressed that the great false God of their ideology – which is actually is a religion, a theology – the Soviet Union, is dead. All we are treated to from the Left nowadays is an overriding theme of hatred, and “against-ism”. They have nothing to offer the world any longer. Even their new chief Deity – the United Nations – has proven to be as corrupt, useless and evil as the Soviet Union.

You would think that the Christian Right would see an opportunity to seize the moment and spread itself around. Nothing of the sort is happening. There’s a reason why.

Christianity can’t seize the moment. In fact, the very reason for the existence of liberalism is Christianity itself!

You see, I was recently privileged to witness and rediscover why I abandoned the very same Christianity of my youth in the first place for liberalism. I have come full circle to believe in a Supreme Being that created the Universe, but I have not subsequently embraced any sort of Christianity.

I witnessed firsthand and rediscovered the hypocrisy and failings of the Christian Right that drove me away in the first place to explore other thinking. Christianity hahad a golden opportunity to advance itself. But it won’t go far because it doesn’t have the flexibility to do so.

It is stuck in archaic thinking due to the mistakes of Biblical translation that give rise to the inflexible dogma that drives many mainstream Protestant sects.

For example, dinosaurs ARE mentioned in the Bible. So too are extraterrestrials mentioned in the Bible – many times! Yet the existence of ETs seems to threaten the conventional Christian establishment. But if they’d just get an accurate translation of the Bible, they’d have nothing to fear.

Meanwhile, during my stay at various email discussion groups, I encountered many liberals. They actually were sympathetic to the words of Jesus, and tended to be far less hospitable - if not downright hostile - toward the God of the Old Testament.

This proves to me that the Left derived its origins from Christianity. They secularized some main points of Christianity, omitting reference to any Supreme Deity. The liberals seized upon the concept of mercy and expanded it to the point of perversion. They abandoned any idea of justice and punishment and illogically extended the idea of mercy to the “humane treatment” of any and all criminals.

As a result, there has been a total disconnect between wrongful acts and punishment. The whole world has been turned upside-down, backwards and inside out. This state of affairs cannot last because it breeds instability and chaos. The end result is a wrold that is totally disincentive and which rewards all the wrong behaviors. That is why the current turmoil exists today and why the very existence of liberalism is now in question.

My assessment is that liberalism and all other forms of left wing politics will not survive the coming Great Correction. It will come in full force in the year 2012.

The religion of Left Wing Politics has now become as inflexible as the Christianity that preceded it and gave birth to it.

Left-wingers have nothing to offer but hate. They have no new ideas and stubbornly cling to antiquated ideas that have long been discredited by the data throughout the last century and a half.

Furthermore, the forces of tribalism, decentralization and fundamentalism ensure that the politics of left wing theology will be thoroughly discredited and they will soon take their place upon the ash-heap of history.

Christianity should take advantage of this turmoil among the leftists, but they will be unable to do so.

Focus now on libertarians: they too will fail. Although they have a sound basis and grounding on economic theory, they too will fail because they abandoned the idea of a Supreme Being that guides the affairs of mankind in a benevolent way. They sound articulate, but in fact, their prescriptions for the ails of mankind rely upon humna solutions rather than a Divine presence who knew all along what the real prescriprion was.

Without the concept of an undeniable Supreme Being that created the Universe, no human thought process would prevail for long. And anybody with any sense can figure out for himself that there is indeed a God, if they had power to think and know where to look.

Fortunately, you don’t have to look very far. Consult the archive article in this blog for an article entitled “Evolution is Impossible” for proof of a bona fide existence of a Supreme Entity that guides the Universe.

Also, don’t forget to look up for a fast read what happened to our solar system in another article herein entitled, “When Worlds Collided”.

I warn you in advance that these articles may contain more truth than you are willing to accept, and once you read them, your worldview will be forever changed. It will do you no good whatsoever to go into full-blown denial after you’ve read them, or else you will fall into the trap of ad hominem attacks against me and make a fool of yourself in the process – for all to see how stupid you really are.

So you have been warned.

As for Islam, well let’s just say that it isn’t a “religion of peace” that the stupid leftists in the media try to portray it. Islam has been involved and still is involved in 98% of all conflicts in the world today. Islam is a “me-too” religion. The Arabs saw their world being overwhelmed by the Christians and Jews of their early days and they had to invent an organized religion of their own.

So why are they gaining adherents?

It is being made possible because of the crusading mentality of this faith. It also rejects the “mercy” concept of the Left and primarily focuses upon punishment to an unreasonable extreme. It is a welcome relief to those sick of the compassion fascists of the Left and the dreamy romanticism of Christianity that also emphasizes mercy, albeit to a lesser degree than liberalism.

The Islamic prescriptions for punishments against crime are sure and swift. There is no room for doubt at all. For a crime-weary society, Islam offers instant answers to crime.

But there is a problem with Islam too: there is little room for mercy. Islam and Christianity emphasize opposite concepts of mercy and punishment. I have found, so far, that the mother of both religions – Judaism – offers the right balance in the first place. But the daughters of Judaism, both Christians and Moslems – both hate their mother and fight among themselves while the delusional granddaughter, the Leftists hate its mother called Christianity and consider an unholy alliance with its aunt Islam against all the rest.

Here is where there exists another reason why the Left will die the death it truly deserves. It is making nice with Islam – a religion that is diametrically opposed to all that the Left holds dear. It is an alliance of convenience. It is a prime example of the ancient Middle East warfare principle of “the enemy of my enemy is my friend”.

If Islam were to take over the world, whom would they kill first? It would be the liberals. After they are of no further use to Islam, the liberals would be executed.
I raised this question to liberals where I used to post email in a political discussion group – and they never could give me a satisfactory answer. I exposed their stupid strategy for the wishful thinking of some moderate leader to sway the populace toward leftism that it was.

Why did leftists enter into an unholy alliance with such people who were so "diametrically opposed to them" ideological group such as Islam? It’s because there’s recognition that the left is no longer a powerful force to be reckoned with in politics! But they will never admit that they are weak. They will continue to delude themselves until their last breath because they can’t stomach that they are out of power.

The Left can't stand the fact that they have little influence and are weaklings in the arena of politcal thought - or any thought of any kind whatsoever.

Granted, the Left still has institutions under its control to try to influence naïve millions of voters toward their failed thinking, but this state of affairs won’t last either. The press and the mainstream educational institutions may exist longer to try to perpetuate their existence further, but there is a new media born that exposes truth and offers an alternative to the mainstream press today – bloggers, internet news, talk radio and the like. The mainstream press now dominated by liberals can no longer control what makes news any longer.

And what is left of the Left to control? It is the activist judges that used to be appointed by liberal-minded presidents and Social Security. BOTH of these are under attack by the current President – George W Bush. THAT is why they are fighting so hard to filibuster and obstruct his judicial appointees, and why these private Social Security accounts. Both of these attack their base political strongholds.

And millions are being exposed to the truth that judges are now completely arbitrary in their decisions lately. If there ever were a revolt by the people or a brave governor of any state within the United States to declare unliaterally that he is invoking his state's 10th Amendment rights, and act accordingly, what could the judicial system do? Nothing!

During this last century, the Left and idiots like President Wilson expanded control of the federal government at the expense of the states and ignored the Constitution and took over power, dictated the terms of World War One, and dictated the terms of peace.

It is because of Woodrow Wilson that we had the Holocaust in the first place.

The creation of the Federal Reserve System – a central bank – allowed the creation of new credit that expanded American power and allowed a European war - World War One - to exist far beyond what it should have and dragged many other nations into.

The war (that would have been over by Christmas in 1914) lasted 4 years and millions of lives. In the process, it gave rise and credibility to the Treaty of Versailles in which the Germans would have to sign a humiliating surrender and give Hitler a reason to rise to power and kill 6,000,000 Jews.

The genocide of 6,000,000 Jews is thus blood on the hands of Woodrow Wilson - the delusional man that thought he had a right to "make the world safe for democracy. I now introduce the term for it as it is rightly and fairly applied for our times: "DEMOCRAZY".

And also in the process, Wilson enabled World War Two that cost the world even more millions of human lives.

The British Empire collapsed and America filled the void as the next hegemonic power. And what has America done with this newfound power?

Again, some good and bad things were done. Communism has collapsed and so too has socialism. But as it was sowing the seeds of destruction among these leftist institutions, it has also absorbed leftist thinking in the form of the Welfare State.

It got contaminated with leftist dogma while destroying the most extreme forms.

The Welfare State cannot stand. Flush with success at WW2, the generation that survived the Great Depression, and starved for lack of plenty, got prosperity that it never imagined and forgot the moral underpinnings that made wealth possible. Children were born from the WW2 Generation that never knew hunger or suffering and yet grew up to believe that they were sufferers and oppressed people, and that the capitalist system was to blame.

These same spoiled brats who never knew real adversity began to invent suffering. They became the Baby Boomers.

But the problem with the Baby Boomers is that the succeeding generations will never be able to be as generous with tax money to fund their own retirement as they were to funds the WW2 generation. There will never be enough without cutting all manner of social programs, so retirement as a concept will be a thing of the past – except for the wealthy, the healthy, the “connected”, and the elected. Retirement for the masses will be a major casualty, among many, of the coming Great Correction.

Retirement is one of those ideas that got born during this 150 Year Fluke of History. Nowhere ever in history was retirement a guaranteed thing.

Since we live in a fluke of history, and since this fluke will be corrected, you can kiss retirement goodbye. All the Baby Boomers who aren’t rich will have to work for the rest of their natural lives at various degrees until they die.

But anyways, I am digressing too far from my main point.

I rejected Islam, Christianity, liberalism and leftist politics.

What is there left?

I remain sympathetic to Judaism. And it’s not contemporary Reform Judaism, but real Orthodox Judaism.

Reform Judaism is nothing more than a nonobservant Jew (impatient with waiting for the Moshiach to change things) contorting his or her religion to conform to his or her liberalism than to letting the religion shape his or her political beliefs.

You cannot be a Jew and a liberal at the same time. Choose your deity. It’s that simple.

As for Jesus, I reject this man’s claim that he is a Son of God. He is no more a child of God than any one of us is.

It is blasphemy to the extreme. His ploy was to get Gentiles closer to God. But Gentiles have little idea of a concept of justice and have to be lead by those who are truly spiritually inclined.

It was the Jews who introduced the concept of an objective sense of right and wrong to the world. For this, they are hated. And they are hated when they abandon the natural role of being the spiritual conscience of humanity. Gentiles know instinctively that Jews are supposed to be “holy”. That’s why the Gentile political leaders secretly thank the Israelis for beating the Arabs in the 6-Day War of 1967 while publicly saying the exact opposite.

And oh yes, that’s true!

By the way, we will meet extraterrestrials in the near future, and sooner than many mental midgets who might be reading this and begin to scoff and write nasty hate mail.

It is the Jews who are the Chosen Ones here on Earth, and there will be “Holy Ones” on other planets in solar systems where there is intelligent life who do acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being that created the Universe.

That is why Christians need not fear the existence of extraterrestrials. It is only the atheists who scoff loudly and denigrate my views because they fear too much that I am right about this topic, and it blows all their cherished theories out of the water about some imaginary, independent life that formed by chance in some evolutionary, mystic way.

Pity the atheists, for they are fools of the lowest order.

Christians are not much better, and neither is Islam. While they will be busy fighting themselves, deluding the atheistic among secular society that it’s about Jews, it really isn’t. It is all about world domination for them because Islam has already stated that Israel is the “Lesser Satan”, and that America, as the dominant representative of the Western World which rules the globe, is the “Great Satan”, and they view the ascension of the West to prominence as a mistake of history to be corrected.

And here we have the Left in an unholy alliance with the very same people who would target them for death as soon as they are no longer useful for their purpose of world domination! The Left has blinded themselves with their own hatred of G W Bush that they are forced into convenient alliances with those equally weak to try to defeat others with no greater an ideology than they themselves!

And then to top it off, the Left likes to delusionally think of themselves “as above the fray”, as if somehow, they think they have a moral superiority to rule – a notion that has long since been dispelled by the truth, yet those who once had the spotlight to themselves without challenge are now being challenged and they don’t know how to deal with it, except to try to destroy the reputation of those who challenge their false beliefs!

So much for their moral superiority! They never had any to begin with.

Yet, in keeping with their delusions, they look for “moderate Arabs” who are certain to endorse their views. Hey, the enemy who seeks to destroy you will tell you anything you want to hear, so long as you are useful to them. After which, when you no longer become useful to them, you will be stabbed in the back or beheaded just like Nick Berg was.

I enjoy kicking liberalism when it’s down because it deserves a death that ought to be celebrated to the Max Q! It is a faggotized, effeminate theology disguised as a political ideology and the liberals hate me for exposing the truth about them. And they doubly hate me because I was once a former liberal. And nothing is more evil to the liberal's way of thinking than a former liberal turning on them and seemingly taking the other side. It is heresy to them, and they treat heresy worse than criminal murderers. That is how low on the moral scale that they have gone - losing all perspective of justice!

The liberals I used to know are afraid to debate me. That’s totally in line with their cowardly nature to pick on people that can’t fight back – like fetuses, children and bedridden patients like Terri Schiavo!

In any case, I issue this challenge to anybody out there who has power to think, or has the guts to challenge ANYTHING I’ve written here – today, in the past, or will do so in the future – to prove me wrong!

WHICH ONE OF YOU LIMP-WRISTED, FAGGOTIZED LOSERS OR DELUSIONAL SO-CALLED “SCHOLARS” WILL STEP FORWARD?

OPEN CHALLENGE TO ANYBODY – ALL TAKERS ACCEPTED.

BRING IT ON, LIMP-WRISTERS.

Resolution 1441: Liberals, Read and Weep

2005-06-23T06:52:00.000-04:00

OK, you limp-wristed, effeminate, liberals!

Here is the text of Resolution 1441 presented below, and you show me anywhere in there where "weapons of Mass Destruction" was the main reason why we went to war in Iraq.

The real reason was a "material breach" of the provisions that Saddam Hussein had to comply with, and that had been going on for 12 years.

The Left tried to switch the focus of the debate to WMD. To some extent, they succeeded, but the truth will come out in blogs like these and your attempts at indoctrination will fail and your credibility and existemce will suffer as a result.

The Left only switched the debate to WMD existence because they were afraid that George W Bush would be successful in prosecuting the War on Terror - the agents of radical Islam of whom the Left are engaged with an unholy alliance.

U.N. Resolution 1441:

United Nations
New York, New York
November 8, 2002

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and United States of America: draft resolution

[Adopted as Resolution 1441 at Security Council meeting 4644, 8 November 2002]

The Security Council,

Recalling all its previous relevant resolutions, in particular its resolutions 661 (1990) of 6 August 1990, 678 (1990) of 29 November 1990, 686 (1991) of 2 March 1991, 687 (1991) of 3 April 1991, 688 (1991) of 5 April 1991, 707 (1991) of 15 August 1991, 715 (1991) of 11 October 1991, 986 (1995) of 14 April 1995, and 1284 (1999) of 17 December 1999, and all the relevant statements of its President,

Recalling also its resolution 1382 (2001) of 29 November 2001 and its intention to implement it fully,

Recognizing the threat Iraq’s non-compliance with Council resolutions and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and long-range missiles poses to international peace and security,

Recalling that its resolution 678 (1990) authorized Member States to use all necessary means to uphold and implement its resolution 660 (1990) of 2 August 1990 and all relevant resolutions subsequent to resolution 660 (1990) and to restore international peace and security in the area,

Further recalling that its resolution 687 (1991) imposed obligations on Iraq as a necessary step for achievement of its stated objective of restoring international peace and security in the area,

Deploring the fact that Iraq has not provided an accurate, full, final, and complete disclosure, as required by resolution 687 (1991), of all aspects of its programmes to develop weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles with a range greater than one hundred and fifty kilometres, and of all holdings of such weapons, their components and production facilities and locations, as well as all other nuclear programmes, including any which it claims are for purposes not related to nuclear-weapons-usable material,

Deploring further that Iraq repeatedly obstructed immediate, unconditional, and unrestricted access to sites designated by the United Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), failed to cooperate fully and unconditionally with UNSCOM and IAEA weapons inspectors, as required by resolution 687 (1991), and ultimately ceased all cooperation with UNSCOM and the IAEA in 1998,

Deploring the absence, since December 1998, in Iraq of international monitoring, inspection, and verification, as required by relevant resolutions, of weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles, in spite of the Council’s repeated demands that Iraq provide immediate, unconditional, and unrestricted access to the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC), established in resolution 1284 (1999) as the successor organization to UNSCOM, and the IAEA, and regretting the consequent prolonging of the crisis in the region and the suffering of the Iraqi people,

Deploring also that the Government of Iraq has failed to comply with its commitments pursuant to resolution 687 (1991) with regard to terrorism, pursuant to resolution 688 (1991) to end repression of its civilian population and to provide access by international humanitarian organizations to all those in need of assistance in Iraq, and pursuant to resolutions 686 (1991), 687 (1991), and 1284 (1999) to return or cooperate in accounting for Kuwaiti and third country nationals wrongfully detained by Iraq, or to return Kuwaiti property wrongfully seized by Iraq,

Recalling that in its resolution 687 (1991) the Council declared that a ceasefire would be based on acceptance by Iraq of the provisions of that resolution, including the obligations on Iraq contained therein,

Determined to ensure full and immediate compliance by Iraq without conditions or restrictions with its obligations under resolution 687 (1991) and other relevant resolutions and recalling that the resolutions of the Council constitute the governing standard of Iraqi compliance,

Recalling that the effective operation of UNMOVIC, as the successor organization to the Special Commission, and the IAEA is essential for the implementation of resolution 687 (1991) and other relevant resolutions,

Noting the letter dated 16 September 2002 from the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Iraq addressed to the Secretary-General is a necessary first step toward rectifying Iraq’s continued failure to comply with relevant Council resolutions,

Noting further the letter dated 8 October 2002 from the Executive Chairman of UNMOVIC and the Director-General of the IAEA to General Al-Saadi of the Government of Iraq laying out the practical arrangements, as a follow-up to their meeting in Vienna, that are prerequisites for the resumption of inspections in Iraq by UNMOVIC and the IAEA, and expressing the gravest concern at the continued failure by the Government of Iraq to provide confirmation of the arrangements as laid out in that letter,

Reaffirming the commitment of all Member States to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Iraq, Kuwait, and the neighboring States,

Commending the Secretary-General and members of the League of Arab States and its Secretary-General for their efforts in this regard,

Determined to secure full compliance with its decisions,

Acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations,

1. Decides that Iraq has been and remains in material breach of its obligations under relevant resolutions, including resolution 687 (1991), in particular through Iraq’s failure to cooperate with United Nations inspectors and the IAEA, and to complete the actions required under paragraphs 8 to 13 of resolution 687 (1991);

2. Decides, while acknowledging paragraph 1 above, to afford Iraq, by this resolution, a final opportunity to comply with its disarmament obligations under relevant resolutions of the Council; and accordingly decides to set up an enhanced inspection regime with the aim of bringing to full and verified completion the disarmament process established by resolution 687 (1991) and subsequent resolutions of the Council;

3. Decides that, in order to begin to comply with its disarmament obligations, in addition to submitting the required biannual declarations, the Government of Iraq shall provide to UNMOVIC, the IAEA, and the Council, not later than 30 days from the date of this resolution, a currently accurate, full, and complete declaration of all aspects of its programmes to develop chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles, and other delivery systems such as unmanned aerial vehicles and dispersal systems designed for use on aircraft, including any holdings and precise locations of such weapons, components, sub-components, stocks of agents, and related material and equipment, the locations and work of its research, development and production facilities, as well as all other chemical, biological, and nuclear programmes, including any which it claims are for purposes not related to weapon production or material;

4. Decides that false statements or omissions in the declarations submitted by Iraq pursuant to this resolution and failure by Iraq at any time to comply with, and cooperate fully in the implementation of, this resolution shall constitute a further material breach of Iraq’s obligations and will be reported to the Council for assessment in accordance with paragraphs 11 and 12 below;

5. Decides that Iraq shall provide UNMOVIC and the IAEA immediate, unimpeded, unconditional, and unrestricted access to any and all, including underground, areas, facilities, buildings, equipment, records, and means of transport which they wish to inspect, as well as immediate, unimpeded, unrestricted, and private access to all officials and other persons whom UNMOVIC or the IAEA wish to interview in the mode or location of UNMOVIC’s or the IAEA’s choice pursuant to any aspect of their mandates; further decides that UNMOVIC and the IAEA may at their discretion conduct interviews inside or outside of Iraq, may facilitate the travel of those interviewed and family members outside of Iraq, and that, at the sole discretion of UNMOVIC and the IAEA, such interviews may occur without the presence of observers from the Iraqi Government; and instructs UNMOVIC and requests the IAEA to resume inspections no later than 45 days following adoption of this resolution and to update the Council 60 days thereafter;

6. Endorses the 8 October 2002 letter from the Executive Chairman of UNMOVIC and the Director-General of the IAEA to General Al-Saadi of the Government of Iraq, which is annexed hereto, and decides that the contents of the letter shall be binding upon Iraq;

7. Decides further that, in view of the prolonged interruption by Iraq of the presence of UNMOVIC and the IAEA and in order for them to accomplish the tasks set forth in this resolution and all previous relevant resolutions and notwithstanding prior understandings, the Council hereby establishes the following revised or additional authorities, which shall be binding upon Iraq, to facilitate their work in Iraq:

– UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall determine the composition of their inspection teams and ensure that these teams are composed of the most qualified and experienced experts available;

– All UNMOVIC and IAEA personnel shall enjoy the privileges and immunities, corresponding to those of experts on mission, provided in the Convention on Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations and the Agreement on the Privileges and Immunities of the IAEA;

– UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have unrestricted rights of entry into and out of Iraq, the right to free, unrestricted, and immediate movement to and from inspection sites, and the right to inspect any sites and buildings, including immediate, unimpeded, unconditional, and unrestricted access to Presidential Sites equal to that at other sites, notwithstanding the provisions of resolution 1154 (1998);

– UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have the right to be provided by Iraq the names of all personnel currently and formerly associated with Iraq’s chemical, biological, nuclear, and ballistic missile programmes and the associated research, development, and production facilities;

– Security of UNMOVIC and IAEA facilities shall be ensured by sufficient United Nations security guards;

– UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have the right to declare, for the purposes of freezing a site to be inspected, exclusion zones, including surrounding areas and transit corridors, in which Iraq will suspend ground and aerial movement so that nothing is changed in or taken out of a site being inspected;

– UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have the free and unrestricted use and landing of fixed- and rotary-winged aircraft, including manned and unmanned reconnaissance vehicles;

– UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have the right at their sole discretion verifiably to remove, destroy, or render harmless all prohibited weapons, subsystems, components, records, materials, and other related items, and the right to impound or close any facilities or equipment for the production thereof; and

– UNMOVIC and the IAEA shall have the right to free import and use of equipment or materials for inspections and to seize and export any equipment, materials, or documents taken during inspections, without search of UNMOVIC or IAEA personnel or official or personal baggage;

8. Decides further that Iraq shall not take or threaten hostile acts directed against any representative or personnel of the United Nations or the IAEA or of any Member State taking action to uphold any Council resolution;

9. Requests the Secretary-General immediately to notify Iraq of this resolution, which is binding on Iraq; demands that Iraq confirm within seven days of that notification its intention to comply fully with this resolution; and demands further that Iraq cooperate immediately, unconditionally, and actively with UNMOVIC and the IAEA;

10. Requests all Member States to give full support to UNMOVIC and the IAEA in the discharge of their mandates, including by providing any information related to prohibited programmes or other aspects of their mandates, including on Iraqi attempts since 1998 to acquire prohibited items, and by recommending sites to be inspected, persons to be interviewed, conditions of such interviews, and data to be collected, the results of which shall be reported to the Council by UNMOVIC and the IAEA;

11. Directs the Executive Chairman of UNMOVIC and the Director-General of the IAEA to report immediately to the Council any interference by Iraq with inspection activities, as well as any failure by Iraq to comply with its disarmament obligations, including its obligations regarding inspections under this resolution;

12. Decides to convene immediately upon receipt of a report in accordance with paragraphs 4 or 11 above, in order to consider the situation and the need for full compliance with all of the relevant Council resolutions in order to secure international peace and security;

13. Recalls, in that context, that the Council has repeatedly warned Iraq that it will face serious consequences as a result of its continued violations of its obligations;

14. Decides to remain seized of the matter.

Disengagement Will Be A Failure

2005-06-22T07:10:00.000-04:00